Hey fellow permies,
I've been doing research to prepare to give a couple workshops on a "lens" for No Mow + Permaculture, and I've come across some useful info and a question that the community may be able to help with.
I've developed a set of techniques specifically for the average residential grower to use their landscape's meager outputs as valuable inputs, while transitioning their lawn to a food forest. The relevant portion of this is that it involves some use of "No Mow" as the landscape progresses through succession. I encourage people to grow this grassy biomass in order to begin to build soil, fertilize soil, and use it to make fertilizer.
In the aspect that is building soil, I've gone down a lignin rabbit hole. Lignin is wood. It takes a long time to break down. It is a super-essential ingredient to build healthy humus, fungal communities, attract beneficial organisms, create a soil composition that has air/water pores, etc. There is some amount of lignin in all plants, ranging from about 7% in grasses, to 40%+ in hardwoods.
My point is to use the No Mow as a source of elements like lignin to build soil. (It may be useful to note here that 95% of the biomass of plants comes from the air. So, when the plant is chopped or otherwise added to the soil, it is a net gain for the soil.)
In pursuing this point I used the devil (AI) to create these useful graphs (attached). What I glean from them is that lignin content in grass increases with age, and thus it's probably best to chop and drop it at the end of summer - fall. This coincides with leaf fall.
The question that I have which is hard to solve is this:
Do you think if a grass is chop and dropped earlier in the season, it will have a higher lignin content than a grass that wasn't?
In research, it was said that more stems = more lignin. I wonder if chop and dropping - or otherwise pruning - an herbaceous perennial like might cause it to produce more stems and thus a higher lignin content than the same grass that wasn't pruned. I'm sure this would vary with species and/or grass classes. It's a bit synonymous with saying that the chop and dropped plant has more biomass at the end of the season than the non chopped plant. I haven't been able to find scientific studies with this nuance, But I think the answer is that most will produce more biomass after chop and drop.
Anyway, I thought this was interesting info and and question, I look forward to your perspectives -
If you're more interested in this idea, I made a video awhile back about it, called No Mow Permaculture: