Creighton Samuels wrote:I got tired of dealing with the Department of Making you Sad and just moved out of the city.
But a cold frame that is light enough to pick up is not a structure, nor a trailer. Another work around is a geodesic dome covered in 5 mil plastic, as the geodesic dome could be considered a child's play structure.
Pearl Sutton wrote:Arthur: With everything you said here, I think my solution would be to find a person outside the city limits who would be thrilled to have you garden up their yard. Lots of folks want a garden, but don't have time, energy or whatever to do it, and would LOVE to have someone else do it and give them some produce. Around here there are a lot of older, widowed women who would fit that category. Even better is a lady whose husband did the garden, but can't do it herself, there may be garden beds already made that can be worked with.
I feel for you, I despise bureaucracy, and am dealing with it too. I'm not a good hoop jumper, that's absolutely not in my skillset.
Joylynn Hardesty wrote:As another option, if you can't do a greenhouse, maybe you can do a low tunnel. Just alter the below to fit your raised beds. The video is in Spanish, but the idea is made clear.
I plan on using this concept to extend some frost-tender stuff this fall.
Jay Angler wrote:D. Logan wrote:
Good point! Many City ordinances are all about "looking good" to improve your neighbor's property value. Making sure your infrastructure either looks "stylish" or well disguised may work so long as you know what those inspections are focused on. If the inspector thinks water storage increases mosquito born disease, you'll have a problem with an open barrel. But a properly fitted barrel built inside a "pretty storage cupboard" with flowers (edible of course) planted around it, could be a help. Some rules can be affected simply by adding wheels. A friend of Hubby's bought one of his portable chicken shelters as a green house - the wheels that went in the corners made it "portable" even though they never planned on moving it.A rain catchment disguised as a storage bench wouldn't catch a single eye, but would serve the same purpose as the more traditional ones that many find so ugly.
I'd also do planning in the whole "edible landscaping" and "food forest" areas - it's amazing how many really pretty plants can be eaten! It's a shame there's so much hatred in places of the lowly dandelion - it's a nutritional power house that grows easily and has pretty flowers that pollinators adore. However, I know from experience that bees adore raspberry blossoms also.
Douglas Alpenstock wrote:Sheesh, those rules are a truckload of dinosaur-brain silliness! I suppose they also require people to spray-paint their front lawn green if there's a drought.
I'm usually a follow-the-law guy, but this situation begs for a little civil disobedience. Talk to your neighbours and see what they will tolerate.
D. Logan wrote:You might see if any food animals are classified pets. Some areas count pigeons as pets, many consider rabbits to be, and almost all count Cui as pets. Each is quality meat in a compact space requirement. Rabbits are especially productive and low effort for high return animals.
Many places have no rules on 'temporary' structures even if they have very strict rules on permanent ones. Some options would be to see if there are some loopholes. Does a temporary structure you take down 3 months out of the year have any special rules listed? Is the limit of 6x4 something where as long as it is smaller than that you're okay? What about a raised bed where you have a clear plastic tenting you put on in the fall and take off in the spring. What about a structure that is able to be moved around? If you can lift it with a fork truck to change it's spot, there's no foundation so it's really just a fancy storage container.
Sometimes it is a matter of how obvious things are. While I won't advocate breaking any laws, I know many places couldn't care less as long as it isn't something obvious. A rain catchment disguised as a storage bench wouldn't catch a single eye, but would serve the same purpose as the more traditional ones that many find so ugly.