gift
Collection of 14 Permaculture/Homesteading Cheat-Sheets, Worksheets, and Guides
will be released to subscribers in: soon!

Jeff Buck

+ Follow
since Jan 09, 2014
Merit badge: bb list bbv list
For More
Denver, Colorado
Apples and Likes
Apples
Total received
In last 30 days
0
Forums and Threads

Recent posts by Jeff Buck

Allen - some times, I feel a twinge of sadness when I think about how much of the work that folks do in Permaculture, Transition, relocalization, etc. is really just figuring out stuff that people probably used to regard as common knowledge. There's no value in dwelling on that, though .. and I'm happy that so many examples of advancing the craft are so readily at my fingertips. Amazing times!
11 years ago
I picture copper tubing coiled around the the duct not too far down stream from the manifold. Is that like what you had in mind?

I'm developing a physical computing class for the middle school where I work. It seems like this would be an interesting place to aim some adult lesson plans. I can imagine a combined workshop with participants learning the science of the RMH, building one, and embedding a sensor network to measure things like the content and temperature of the exhaust gas along the length of the duct. Then, once it's cured, someone could burn the thing for a long time and keep track of the internal conditions of the system. That would help to decide where to place the coil in the final design to make as sure as possible it will not be able to heat water beyond a safe temperature.

You could also embed temp sensors in the mass to help locate a different place to locate some kind of mass-to-water heat exchanger. That would be easy in a pebble style RMH - just dig up the sensors and burry the exchanger in the same place. With cob and the like you'd have to build a test bench before the final bench or design for partial demolition and repair

Since I'm kind of a geek I would also want to incorporate thermoelectric generation to run the controller and maybe even the pump - and charge this laptop when the pump isn't running, and maybe an LED lamp for when I'm up late reading Permies. The design would need to protect the unit(s) from excessive heat and make them easily accessible because I'd want to experiment with them.

I don't think this kind of high tech stuff turns up often on the forums so I hope it doesn't offend anyone's sensibilities. But this stuff has become so cheap and accessible, I've come to view them as an appropriate technology to apply in the development and refinement of low-tech. We use electrically powered vehicles and tools in our large-scale projects, why not an electrically powered (and cheap) nervous system in our smaller-scale projects?
11 years ago
Hello, Jeff here. Long time lurker, first time poster. I've been here studying to build a RMH at home. I've been dissuaded from the basement so it'll be for the workshop/greenhouse or outdoor seating, maybe on the front porch. We live in a neighborhood where the houses were built back when people were generally more social so the porch is a good one (concrete and brick and big).

Anyway, I'm also interested in biochar and noticed this thread. I want to make sure I understand your setup. I think the steel vessel in the third picture is your retort which sits on the angle iron and the flue gas from the stove passes around but not through the retort. Put another way, the pipe going off the top of the second photo is a chimney for the retort only, not for rocket stove gas. Is that right?

If so and you get the load to char, I think you'll get a lot of pretty nasty exhaust out the top of it. That's all unutilized fuel ... and nasty.

The second photo in this thread shows a way to get at that fuel that seems compatible with your setup. Once pyrolysis begins, combustion of exhaust gasses in the burn tunnel could eliminate the need for additional wood fuel at some point if well designed. A chimney like yours would probably help it draw better. But I imagine quite a bit of gunk could condense out of the smog on the way down that pipe to the burn tunnel so I have to wonder if it's prone to clogging.

Two years ago, I taught my 7th grade class how to make biochar using the instructional materials found here. We made TLUD stoves out of soup cans and developed a rubric to evaluate the charcoal. These were scaled down versions of the type linked to by John Elliott earlier. It was a BLAST and I will never again hesitate to teach kids about fire in a serious and intelligent way (we did it in science class).

At the end of the project, students shared some of their research on other ways to make biochar. There's some pretty sophisticated, hand made systems being used out there, but I like simple. This is one of my favorites, sort of a collapsed version of yours. An L- shaped rocket stove is built right into the retort itself. The heat riser is not insulated and becomes the heat exchanger for the load in the retort. The pipe out it's top is from the rocket stove, not the retort and there's a small port from the retort into the burn tunnel near its mouth. Once the wood releases enough gas to produce a steady flow, it keeps the process going without additional wood though I suspect it gets hot enough to burn off some of the carbon rather than leave it as charcoal. It seems well made to me but looks like it might be dangerous which definitely got the kids' attention.

Some students proposed building one of these and a barrel sized TLUD to see if one did a better job than the other. An accessory for a J-type rocket stove such has you have built would be an interesting comparison too. But alas, summer arrived and I didn't teach science the next year. There are still photos of kids firing their stoves hanging around the school. I wonder how many of them could still describe what's going on in the stove or detail the differences between the pyrolysis of the wood and the intense after burn swirling around the secondary air ports. They've all continued to high school but I still see some of them. I'll ask.
11 years ago