Peter VanDerWal wrote:Perhaps someplace near Tucson, but away from Phoenix. Phoenix is crazy hot.
Kyrt Ryder wrote:
Tim Jones wrote:9. No more than an hour drive to a major city
How are you defining 'Major City'?
Less than an hour from a metropolis [Seattle, Portland or San Francisco is going to be very hard to find at a low cost. If smaller scale cities are on your radar you can do better.
Mike Jay wrote:Are you sure you want to limit yourself to zone 9a/b? Unless I'm misreading the zone map, that limits you to a bit of central Florida, southern Louisiana, south Texas, south AZ and the Pacific coast. My assumption is that those line up with either your hurricane or scorpion avoidance criteria or are pretty costly (Pacific coast).
If you stretch yourself to zone 8a (which is still terribly hot in my opinion), you open yourself up to many places in the southeast and over to central TX.
What are your feelings about humidity? What is your max and min temperature desires?
I just picked a random big city on the north end of zone 8a (Little Rock, AR) and did a Realtor.com search. I limited it to 5+ acres, <$150K, 2+ bedrooms and 20 miles from town and got a few interesting places. Here's one that sounds interesting: 10 acres, $85K
It has fruit trees, a log home shell that needs to be finished, outbuildings, mobile home for the short term, etc etc etc. It is kind of near to a freeway though.
Land with houses can be pretty affordable if you expand your search range.
stephen lowe wrote:With your hardiness zone request you've pretty much got the coastal west or the dessert as your 'closest' options to your folks place. So if you really want to be near a city that means you are looking at SF bay area (unlikely to find the price range you want), Portland (seems possible to find something there within an hour), or Seattle-Tacoma (from what I hear, increasingly difficult to find affordable housing around there). Otherwise you're moving pretty far away from family. I would suggest you keep an eye on the northern coastal counties of California, you won't exactly be an hour from a 'Major' city, but land prices are lower and generally falling and you're only a days drive from the bay area. Del Norte is the furtherst and already quite cheap, Humboldt is getting cheaper and is slightly closer and has more private land than Del Norte, Mendocino or very far norhtern Sonoma are going to be the closest and will definitely offer the most city access however they are the most expensive and most drought prone of these options. But you might be able to scoop up land on the cheap that was just burned out by the fires last year. You might also look into Lake county.
Best of luck with your search.
N Hansen wrote:Scientific study?
I saw this a few years ago on the topic. They found an 80% water savings by using mulch.
See here: http://www.recycledh2o.net/2015/05/16/thinking-of-re-landscaping-consider-using-mulch/