I have a somewhat technical soil question I'm going to ask you guys.
Bear with me while I think out loud.
First, does syntropic farming work for dry land situations?
And in dry land situations, should organic matter ever be left on the surface?
The obvious answer seems to be yes, but I have seen posts about organic matter oxidizing straight into the air on this forum, and I've sort of witnessed something like that in real life.
My grandparents had a conventional farm in Western Kansas that I visited often as a kid. I still remember a giant pile of brush that never broke down over decades and slowly just bleached in the sun. It seemed like it probably never even helped the soil under it. Everything just seemed dead.
So I guess my question is, would it have worked as a Hugelculture if it had been well watered when it was established? Or would it have still dried out and sat there for ages, just with a little bit of dirt on top of it?
And the question that directly applies to my site is: will chopped and dropped plants have the same fate as that old brush pile? I do live farther east. We do get higher rainfall. I think it can vary dramatically between 15 and 35 inches of rainfall a year. It's usually on the lower end of that.
I don't want to pile a bunch of grass on the soil that will just sit there for all time. Or go straight back into the atmosphere. But at the same time mulch does seem like it makes the soil nicer underneath. So even if it's going back into the atmosphere at least the plants around it are benefiting? I guess I'm just wondering if I'm only speeding up CO2 release or if chop and drop will do something to build soil. I just can't imagine that I will see the amazing soil buildup that syntropic farming promises.
Does syntropic farming and chop and drop come down to having the roots die in the soil and leaving their carbon behind? That would make some kind of sense to me.
I'm hoping that's the case because having to make everything into a Hugelculture sounds burdensome, to say the least.