paul wheaton wrote:
I've had a lot of fluorescent bulbs die on me really quick too. And when they say the fluorescent light bulbs last ten times longer, I think the caveat is that you have to leave the light on all the time. But if you leave the light on a lot more in order to go easy on the bulb, doesn't that negate the energy savings?
I guess I would like to see some sort of consumer-reports-like study showing 20 different fluorescent bulbs and 20 different incandescent bulbs. Let's track the lumens and power used. Let's find the unsubsidized cost. Let's put all of the bulbs through three different tests:
1) leave the lights on 24x7
2) leave the lights on for an hour, off for an hour - until the bulb burns out
3) on for a minute, off for a minute - until the bulb burns out
Until then, my thinking is that what they are saying is "fluorescent light bulbs last 10 times longer than incandescent bulbs *" and then "* a first class fluorescent is left on continuously for three years and a crappy/cheap incandescent died after four months."
I cannot help but think that a good incandescent bulb can last just as long as a good fluorescent. Especially under normal use.
paul wheaton wrote:
I haven't seen anything with more detail. Do you have a link?