T Giles

+ Follow
since Sep 14, 2020
Merit badge: bb list bbv list
For More
Apples and Likes
Apples
Total received
In last 30 days
0
Forums and Threads

Recent posts by T Giles

I tried as best as I could to see what changes have been made, but of course an explanation works better.

I have a few questions regarding the stove

1. Is there any secondary air, if there is, where

2. Is the box still the same dimensions as on the batchrocket.eu site?

3. It appears as if the port has been moved to the top rear of the box, and that the riser/riser stub has been completely removed. If that is the case, how is the box scaled in the absence of riser CSA?

4. The cylinder used for the top box, that is generally used to contain molten metal, am I correct? What is it called and where could one procure one

5. The dsr2 system allows for an open firebox, does this new system allow for that? If the answer to question 1 is a yes does making this an open system eliminate the need for secondary air?.
4 years ago
thank you for responding. I took the time to read through those donkey boards and theres just a little bit of information I still need.

how tall is the top box compared to the firebox, should the riser stub be flush with the top box back wall or should there be space,

and how large should the stumbler block be
4 years ago
Hi, new here.

Ive been researching PVB batch boxes for a while and have a few questions about a design I wish to implement

Using the ratios on batchrocket.eu I have calculated the size that a box with a 2" riser would be. I havent heard of a box that small being attempted before, and Im curious if the drastic change in size will adversely affect efficiency.

second, I also wish to implement a few design tweaks to the original batch box and once again would like to ask if about potential losses or gains.

the first and foremost tweak would be moving the port to the top of the firebox, rather than the rear, similar to the double shoebox design seen on peter van den berg's more recent videos. However, unlike the more square shape seen in his videos, I would like to retain the long(tall) narrow port that the original batch box design has.

I have questions about the double shoebox design in general, how efficient is it compared to a regular batch box. How do the measurements in a horizontal riser compare to that of a vertical one, considering that in the original design the riser is taller than the firebox is long. could the horizontal riser simply be shorter and retain the same CSA as a vertical one, or would the CSA have to increase to account for the shorter length?

can a vertical riser be used with a port that rests on the top of the firebox?

another design change I wish to implement would be moving the 45° angles from the bottom corners to the top corners of the box.  I am unsure about whether those would extend all the way back in the firebox or stop just shy of where the port would begin.

Finally, If the port is on the top, could the p channel simply be straight into the port rather than L shaped down into the firebox

If any or all of my questions could be answered, that would be great. I have included a few rudimentary drawings I have to illustrate certain design tweaks
4 years ago