Jay Angler wrote:
Burra Maluca wrote:OK, current ideas involve something like this...
![]()
OK, I was thinking along those lines, but with taller legs to be a foot stool or a "sit-upon" when you need to be fairly low to the ground, but don't bend well enough any more to actually sit on the ground. Sigh, I can still kneel if the surface is soft, but sitting cross-legged was never my strong suit. If I need to sit to sort through my lowest sewing drawer, I sit on a footstool that's approximately 6" tall. I was lucky and found an old set of sofa legs to make my foot stool out of.
M Ljin wrote:
That we choose who and what shape our minds, and this is a serious decision.
If I were to choose who my foremost teacher is, the one I listen to above all others, I would call it “mystery”. Or myself. Or both. Trusting yourself leads to creativity, to wisdom, to perception. Whenever I gave my mind to others, I would find that the language-mediated reality they offered was only partial. When I gave my mind to mystery, finally I would learn. Not knowing is knowing truly.
I am not trying to imitate sustainable people, or anyone, just follow what I know in my heart to be true. That has always lead me well, even if it has taken me to places that seem like madness or irrationality.
I flipped open a book yesterday: “This is your mind on plants” by Michael Pollen, the chapter on caffeine. It was just the right section—it was describing how caffeine, in effect, shaped the patterns of thought and perception in society and ushered in the age of rationalism. (I don’t use caffeine and it makes a difference!) If we took that one substance away, would the whole paradigm crumble, would our perception of reality change entirely? And culture works the same way. If you only work within one cultural context there is no room for contradicting it. If you free yourself from cultural context, it opens up into the vastness of the world. And that is where we find what we need to create real change.
Not saying people in college don’t think (not at all!) but that working alone, self in concert with mystery, is a very different and very valid approach, and allows for a lot more creativity and novelty than working within an existing cultural paradigm. (It might be said that that is the work of the shaman, even…)
John F Dean wrote:I have had it in the house for a while. It lights up, but it doesn’t run. Yes, I checked the chain break.
paul wheaton wrote:I hear from many people (and see it all over the internet): gotta stop AI; gotta stop the bots ... "DEY TERK ER JERBS!" ... it strikes me as twisted to desire jobs so much.
I had huge hopes that we would embrace the scenario I laid out, and then explore permaculture solutions.
With a humble home and a huge garden ...
- maybe it doesn't matter if you lose your job
- maybe you have a MASSIVE advantage
- maybe all this stuff becomes interesting rather than scary
- is better than living in the city with a lot of money ... which will drain away
- maybe you can share your bounty with friends