Daniel VanTassell

Alrighty. Here is a sharper image, which in my opinion, looks much better. What do You think, Paul?

EDIT: I know it's hard to tell with the smaller resolution, but with the full size version, there is a difference.

Kane Jamison wrote:Hi Daniel, it's loading on my screen at 798px × 168px, so if you have a 940x198 version please email it to me at kanejamison (a t ) gmail (dot) com and I will upload it. Thanks!

AHA! It's Photobucket that downsized the image. Sneaky, sneaky. . .

. . . Now, the image is in Your inbox. Thanks, Kane!

paul wheaton wrote:Daniel! That is excellent! And there's even the M!

So glad You like it, Paul. I really enjoy piece, and enjoyed the process.

Kane Jamison wrote:
Hi Daniel, that looks great - is their any chance you have it in a slightly wider version? The ideal width is 940 pixels. It works in its current state, it just gets slightly pixelated when uploaded.

Hey Kane! Interesting little error. The image is exactly 940 x 198 pixels, with a native resolution of 72ppi. Do You still want a wider version? It's easy to do, but I am unsure if it will fix the issue.

What y'all think?

Here is a quick environment sketch without the lady. This is subject to change.