thomas rubino wrote:Hi Anthony;
With a normal box stove I 100% agree.
I directed Warren to Peter Bergs Batchbox site as well as Matt Walkers site.
Both are classed as rocket mass heaters. Peters being highly efficient batchbox designs.
Matt" stoves are a highly efficient riserless design.
A glass front on these stoves is not taking away from their efficiency.
If you are not familiar with these designs then I highly recommend you check them out!
I designed a mix of both Peter's and Matt's. It is a 4" riser that heats a 1/2" x 12" x 24" steel plate for cooking. From there it turns into a 3' x 4' x 2' "bell"? then to the chimney. While it is great at heating, it doesn't operate at it's full potential since I had to reduce the riser's length to accommodate for our short stature so we could reach the cooking plate with ease. Also, being an uninsulated and small firebox and
cob riser, it takes a bit to get up to temperature and start to "rocket". When the ceramic insulation would come unglued from the steel door, I would lose about 150-200 degrees from the firebox firebrick on a 2 hour fire. So, I assume the steel door was conducting heat away from the firebox instead of being insulated and allowing more heat to soak into the fire brick or increase the riser temperatures to increase the burn's temperatures and the heater's efficiency.
I know I'm going to have several versions of my heater to get it as right as I can, but I believe I will always be glad I don't have a conventional
wood stove.
Warren, it wasn't my intent to hijack your
thread. Hopefully, you can build something into your design where you can have both efficiency and soothing ambiance.