Things I found very useful in that report that modern science doesn't normally point out.
-Whether or not a tree is 'bled' has zero effect on a
trees structural properties, yet many lumber companies at that time period(wouldn't surprise me if it was still the same today) refused 'unbled' trees.
-As a rule of thumb, structural strength goes by weight, then whether from base or from top, and then whether from heartwood or from sapwood/bark. This applies to all species of trees.
-Most species
experience drastically increased structural strength when dried evenly to moisture levels at 12-15% moisture. Pine trees increase in structural strength anywhere from 40% to 100%, oak trees increase 90% to 190%, hickory 100% to 190%, elm 40% to 80%,
ash 50% to 70%.
-Locality of the tree has ZERO effect on the structural strength of the wood despite popular belief at that time period(wouldn't surprise me if that belief was still the same today).
-Structural strength of species generally go from pine to oak to hickory. Pine being the lightest, then oak, then hickory(the heaviest).
Ill add the rest of the nuggets of truth tomorrow, I gotta get to bed!