The picture is NOT to scale. The width of the suntrap is 200 feet and the length will be around 300.
The
water table on my
land is high and in the spring the land in this field does become saturated to the point of near standing water but there is no standing water once the summer heat hits. the soil is extremely sandy for the first three feet or so, and then you hit a light grey coloured clay that is about the consistency of playdough. I'm not sure I need to but if the
pond doesn't hold water I might use the gley method.
The ponds will be rainwater fed, though I was thinking it might be a good idea to run canal's joining each
pond. There are already natural shallow spillways every 30 feet or so in the field.
I have a row of 7 of 50' X 5' hugelbeetes running north-south already built, with more in the works. They are on a slight grade that is almost non-existent but it is there. The row of
hugel pictured south of the straight north south beds have yet to be made. They are on an angle because the slope at that point becomes more drastic, and diagonal direction is what
Sepp Holzer recommends to do in order to not slow down water flow too much which could dry up downhill beds, which could happen if I ran teh beds straight east-west.
Now I'm coming to the point where I need to think about using the backhoe I rented until tuesday for ponds and swales...
North of the beds I was thinking of having a 10' wide path for tractor/truck access, and a swale on the north side of this path. Maybe I
should have this in reverse; the swale about 4 feet north of the hugel, and then teh 10 ' path to the north of the swale?
To the north of thid I was thinking of adding the two ponds with keyhole type peninsula's to grow blueberries etc. and a
berm around it. The black lines in the rectangular ponds represent keyholes.
Trees would be planted on all the berms to cast shade. Sunflowers would be used yearly until the trees shoot up.
Does this plan look sound? What changes would you make?