This question is not directly aimed at Zach, but of
course his input is more than welcome. And now's as good a time as any to start a
thread in this forum, right?
Of course, a large component of
permaculture is diversity. And a large component of market
gardening is productivity and efficiency. I'm wondering how you all merge the two, maintaining a market garden that has to have some level of efficiency to be profitable, while ensuring that there is sufficient diversity for ecological reasons.
(A tangential subject to this is, I think, maintaining a high level of diversity while avoiding pest buildup problems. I'm thinking specifically of diversity created through self-sowing plants, though maybe that's swinging too wide of the subject at hand.)
On a small, kitchen garden scale, where the planting needs to be quite intensive, it's no problem to have species scattered here and there, so that, for example, you go here for lettuce, there for arugula, gather some dandelion greens from that corner, pick the
volunteer amaranth from among the small squash plants, etc. etc., to make a dinner salad. But this seems much less feasible from a larger, market garden perspective, where one can't spend all day gathering salad greens.
Once one gets to a large
enough scale, one could grow crops in rows or beds and let 'weeds' populate in between. Thus diversity is maintained, as is harvesting efficiency; the larger scale allows for a less intensive use of the
land.
Is there a middle ground, or is that no-man's-land? Can one grow a wide array of crops, interspersed with one another (and not segregated into beds or rows), and maintain enough efficiency to be profitable? How do you make it work, on what scale, and with what crops? What specifics do you employ?