Joseph Lofthouse wrote:Grains!? What a huge topic.
The grain called corn produces huge yields with minimal labor. A simple, hand cranked, hundred year old sheller can process hundreds of pounds per hour.
The grain rye grows wild in my community without irrigation, without weeding, without planting. It self-grows as a feral food. Harvest goes quickly.
A 13 foot long row of wheat provides 5 pounds of grain for me, which could feed me bread for a week. It takes me an hour to harvest and clean with simple tools like a stick, tarp, and a couple of buckets. So in 50 hour week, I could harvest and clean enough wheat to feed myself for a year.
I grow oats, but haven't fallen in love with productivity or processing.
Barley seems hard for me.
I can't grow rice.
I might could grow sorghum, millet, amaranth, or kinwa grains, but I didn't grow up with them as part of my social indoctrination.
.
Josh Warfield wrote:Saying flat out that grains aren't worth it is a little intense, compared to what Mr. Lawton actually said in the video. I thought he seemed quite careful to clarify that he wasn't making a universal statement, only one based on his specific context, and suggesting that most small-scale producers would find their context to be similar to his.
Of course, he did say something more nuanced. But I liked the punch of the video.
I tried to grow oats back in the colder climate, and the rats ate it. The same with the corn.
But I had a huge success with amaranth but the processing was a bit difficult.
I think that the main problem with grains is the processing and not the growing, but I will see how my trials go this year (rats, birds, kangaroos, deer)
I use seeds from the supermarket or the Indian grocery store., they germinate just fine.
With the sweet potatoes, I found there is a decline in yield after a while. I planted them in our sandy garden.