• Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
permaculture forums growies critters building homesteading energy monies kitchen purity ungarbage community wilderness fiber arts art permaculture artisans regional education skip experiences global resources cider press projects digital market permies.com pie forums private forums all forums
this forum made possible by our volunteer staff, including ...
master stewards:
  • r ranson
  • Anne Miller
  • paul wheaton
  • Pearl Sutton
stewards:
  • Beau Davidson
  • Nicole Alderman
  • Leigh Tate
master gardeners:
  • Carla Burke
  • John F Dean
  • Nancy Reading
  • Jay Angler
gardeners:
  • Jules Silverlock
  • Jordan Holland
  • Paul Fookes

Have you Googled Murray Bookchin?

 
Posts: 80
27
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Any fans of social ecology out there?

I personally love Murray Bookchin's work, and I think his theory of social ecology did for philosophy and ethics what permaculture did for design. I think the two are a natural fit, and share a lot in common (though I think there are important distinctions). The idea that we can glean not just design strategies and principles, but actionable ethics from observing the natural world is fascinating to me. I also like the concepts of First Nature (evolutionary nature, of which humanity is a part), Second Nature (human society and institutions specifically), and Free Nature (the state where the two are harmonized).

A lot of ecological movements and philosophies try to make you think humans are supreme beings apart from and fit to rule all other life; no more unique or special than any other form of life (i.e. all lifeforms are functionally the same); or insignificant, cancerous aberrations that should either be contained like a pathogen, outright destroyed, or prevented from making use of our natural ability to shape the environment. I like that Social Ecology breaks down these distinctions and says that humans are completely a part of the larger evolutionary nature and connected to all beings, but also a distinct, unique being with an unrivaled capacity to shape its environment (and for the better, if we dare to "fill our niche"). I believe some of these ideas influenced permaculture itself as well, as I believe David Holmgren has mentioned before.

"Well, I think the work of Murray Bookchin and his work in Social Ecology was definitely one of the contemporary ideas that was breaking out of those old leftist moulds that saw the resources that were available were something for humans to use at will, and that we could have control over things, and how we divide up the spoils – to actually say, “no we need to do that within an ecological framework”. Social justice could not exist without ecological sustainability. And people could argue the reverse." David Holmgren (https://permaculturenews.org/2016/11/01/david-holmgren-social-political-underpinnings-permaculture/)

I also think the connection between social and ecological issues is important, and attempts to build an ecological society without addressing social issues are putting the cart before the horse! What do you think?

 
There will be plenty of time to discuss your objections when and if you return. The cargo is this tiny ad:
3D Plans - Pebble Style Rocket Mass Heater
https://permies.com/wiki/193712/Plans-Pebble-Style-Rocket-Mass
    Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic