Win a copy of For the Love of Paw Paws this week in the Fruit Trees forum!
  • Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
permaculture forums growies critters building homesteading energy monies kitchen purity ungarbage community wilderness fiber arts art permaculture artisans regional education experiences global resources the cider press projects digital market permies.com private forums all forums
this forum made possible by our volunteer staff, including ...
master stewards:
  • Nicole Alderman
  • r ranson
  • Anne Miller
  • paul wheaton
stewards:
  • Jocelyn Campbell
  • Mike Jay Haasl
  • Burra Maluca
garden masters:
  • James Freyr
  • Joylynn Hardesty
  • Steve Thorn
  • Greg Martin
gardeners:
  • Carla Burke
  • Dave Burton
  • Pearl Sutton

Roselle, true or false?

 
Posts: 239
Location: west central Florida
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
I have converted some of the front lawn to mulched bed, now I need to plant something ornamental, preferably edible, and evergreen in Zone 9A and I am leaning toward cranberry hibiscus and day lillies, the latter of which of course would not be evergreen. Turns out true roselle (Hibiscus sabdariffa) and false roselle (Hibiscus acetosella) are both called "cranberry hibiscus". Well my understanding of these two is very tenuous, but here it is: Could it be that true roselle is the better of the two for culinary purposes but false roselle is considered by most to be more ornamental, while also being edible? Please, anyone who knows anything about either of these, share what you know and let me know which one you would choose. Or would you use both? Our bed is big enough for 5-7 full grown hibiscus say about 6 ft x 6 ft. I bet the answer is going to be, as usual, more complicated because each one has different varieties and so forth and so on. Oh well, I asked for it.
 
master pollinator
Posts: 11375
Location: Central Texas USA Latitude 30 Zone 8
743
cat forest garden fish trees chicken fiber arts wood heat greening the desert
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
False Roselle Hibiscus acetosella gets an edibility rating of 2 at Plants for a Future, whereas Roselle Hibiscus sabdariffa gets a 3. Rose of Sharon Hibiscus syriacus gets a 4.

http://www.pfaf.org/user/Plant.aspx?LatinName=Hibiscus+acetosella

http://www.pfaf.org/user/Plant.aspx?LatinName=Hibiscus+sabdariffa

http://www.pfaf.org/user/Plant.aspx?LatinName=Hibiscus+syriacus
 
Posts: 25
Location: Northern England
1
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Ooh, and H. syriacus is hardier too, thanks Tyler! Anyone grown it?
 
If you are using a wood chipper, you are doing it wrong. Even on this tiny ad:
Switching from electric heat to a rocket mass heater reduces your carbon footprint as much as parking 7 cars
http://woodheat.net
  • Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
Boost this thread!