The general theme is, of course, ruler straight lines of trees with either bare plowed dirt or a small amount of grass in between. There is plentiful space underneath the trees to grow other crops, and it would seem that the orchardists would be utilizing this space to produce a second income stream, but in my entire journey I only came across one orchard that had hay growing between the young trees. This was the only example of polyculture I witnessed in the valley. As a permaculturalist, I have plenty of ideas about how all this space could be used to produce more food/income, add fertility to the soil, solve the problem of migratory bee-keeping, ect., but I wonder why these concepts are non-existent in the world of commercial food production. What are your thoughts on this?
My thoughts are that the core of the problem is that of cooperation vs. competition. In the farmers' minds, different species in the natural world are locked in a war over resources. To them, a crop growing in the empty spaces between the trees would be stealing water and nutrients from the trees, and neither crop would do as well. In permaculture, we know that the natural world operates on competition, and that the right plants together will result in better yields for both crops, but why is this idea so foreign to an industry that in the business of better yields? How do we convince these farmers who have been operating on the competition model for so long that the better way to go is cooperation? I feel that if they could be convinced to at least grow a legume cover crop in between the trees, the doors would be opened to more complex polyculture.
I am curious to know if you started out as a traditional orchardist using conventional methods and then discovered permaculture, or did you discover permaculture first and then decide to become an orchardist?
![[Logo]](/templates/default/mobile/images/mobile-permies-2015.png)


