• Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
permaculture forums growies critters building homesteading energy monies kitchen purity ungarbage community wilderness fiber arts art permaculture artisans regional education skip experiences global resources cider press projects digital market permies.com private forums all forums
this forum made possible by our volunteer staff, including ...
master stewards:
  • Nicole Alderman
  • Anne Miller
  • r ranson
  • paul wheaton
  • Pearl Sutton
  • James Freyr
  • Burra Maluca
  • Mike Haasl
  • Joylynn Hardesty
master gardeners:
  • Steve Thorn
  • Greg Martin
  • thomas rubino
  • Jay Angler
  • Tereza Okava

And below ground?

Posts: 1981
Location: La Palma (Canary island) Zone 11
purity forest garden tiny house wofati bike solar
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
If I want to plant more trees = deeper roots, in a place where they used to sow winter grains = shallow roots,
I have to change the depth of the soil.

Example: all people who planted avocadoes is thin soil got their trees dead after a few years.

So I want to break the old rock, quite easy here (except when grey basalt!), so that humic acids can do their job, and roots can go down.

I have seen that some trees would be great, like marula, BUT they need a lot of space as their roots need to go MUCH further than their crown. In that case, you only get savanna, as trees cannot grow close to another.

Even for more conventional tree crops, I can plant more if roots can go down, yes?

So: carbon fossile loss versus gaining afterward.... More roots and more trunks and branches.

Question to Eric: do you speak about ground work to install perenial crops? Is it also a sort of solution for a wise use of the left fossile energy we have? Is the ratio of input and output worthwhile at greater range than a little propertie?

Also, is the type of ground a common reason for farmers going on with annual crops?
We want to imitate nature, but to produce more food and other useful stuff than nature. Here, only pines can go down rock cracks and even break rocks. And when they burn, they fix more carbon, because it is the only pine that re-grow after a fire. They did also provide wood for building, but now they are protected.
No income from them, and we need to plant things that the ground is not made for....
Posts: 145
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
I do think making improvements to allow better kinds of agriculture is a good use of remaining fossil fuel. Or even better of biodiesel or vegetable oil fuel. I can't speak to the particular soils and situations in your area, but a savanna is still a really wonderful thing, Including in terms of carbon.
My, my, aren't you a big fella. Here, have a tiny ad:
One million tiny ads for $25
    Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic