I have started to experiment with various aspects of biodynamic
gardening. I don't pretend to really understand it well, but I'm having an open mind. Several people on this site and others spend a great deal of time and
energy ridiculing biodynamics. Some have decided that it can't work. I realize that it is a complicated system, and some people are amazingly uncomfortable with systems that have parts that can't be established under double blind controlled studies. They often state that there is no evidence that it works, and proudly walk away. I have found parts of it to work in my
experience. I realize that what I'm experiencing is not research. Here is some from Washington State University. This is from ATTRA, the
sustainable research newsletter part of the USDA:
Research at WSU
by Dr. Lynn Carpenter-Boggs and Dr. John
Reganold found that biodynamic
compost
preparations have a significant effect on compost
and the composting process (7). Biodynamically
treated composts had higher temperatures,
matured faster, and had higher nitrates than
control compost piles inoculated with field soil
instead of the preparations. The WSU research is
unique for two reasons: it was the first
biodynamic compost research undertaken at a
land-grant university, and it demonstrated that
biodynamic preparations are not only effective,
but effective in homeopathic quantities.
A summary of this research can be found on the
USDA-Agriculture Research Service's Tektran
Website at:
Effects of Biodynamic Preparations on Compost
Development
www.nal.usda.gov/ttic/tektran/data/
000009/06/0000090623.html
In my view, if even the big ag centered USDA is willing to admit that there is something going on in biodynamic agriculture, we are very narrow minded if we dismiss it out of hand. John S
PDX OR