Permaculture, on a large scale, takes a large initial input of cash (or many years of labor) to establish. If they are accepting cash grants to accomplish this, then YES, it is
permaculture. If, however, they need large inputs of cash to keep it going, then I would say it is NOT
permaculture. A basic principle of permaculture is that once established, it takes a minimum amount of inputs (cash and labor) to maintain it. If/when the day comes that those funds are no longer available, will they be able to self-sustain themselves at their present levels? If they can, it is permaculture, if they cannot, then it is not permaculture. Using cash to short-cut the time element does not disqualify it as permaculture. (IMHO)