• Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic

Carbon sequestering problem in trees  RSS feed

 
Posts: 395
Location: New York
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
There is a downside to sequestering carbon in trees.

http://www.amcostarica.com/morenews3.htm
 
pollinator
Posts: 9744
Location: Central Texas USA Latitude 30 Zone 8
189
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
I wouldn't worry about it much.  The benefits of planting trees far outweigh any possible negative effects  The negative effects of not planting trees (or of clear-cutting them all, as one politician proposed) are far worse.

 
steward
Posts: 979
Location: Northern Zone, Costa Rica - 200 to 300 meters Tropical Humid Rainforest
15
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
I would think the main reasons to plant trees (it is what we do) is for a sustainable building material, to improve fresh water, prevent erosion, make things cooler, improve habitat, create topsoil....

I could go on, but capturing carbon is way down on my list. We started planting trees due to deforestation, that is still happening. Perhaps some day they will have carbon trading figured out, but I am not holding my breath.
 
Posts: 98
Location: Eastern Colorado, USA
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
There was an editorial in my local fishwrap a couple years ago suggesting that we needed to log off the Rockies because pine trees were causing too much ozone haze.

Something about the dangers of dihydrogen monoxide came to mind, but there wasn't a "just kidding" at the end....
 
Wink, wink, nudge, nudge, say no more ... richsoil.com/cards
  • Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
Boost this thread!