I am reading Dave Jacke's book (2 volumes) "Edible Forest Gardens". In the book Edible Forest Garden, he describes the two different food webs. One is bacterial which is the "native" soil food web environment for annuals. This food web is dominated by bacteria which is capable of fully "digesting" the biomass produced by grasses and annuals. This bacterial environment also inhibits shrub and pioneer trees. Conversely, again according to Jacke, rough cellulose biomass (leaves, trigs, wood chips, and woody dead matter) is tailored for a fungus foodweb. This food web is antagonistic toward annual plants.
Now the question:
If this is true (bacterial is good for annuals and fungal is bad for annuals) why is the wood chip garden method seemingly so productive. Far be it for me to question Mr Jacje, but this seems to be a contradiction between theory and experience? - I'm just sayin'
Thoughts?
PS I cannot recommend the books more highly. It is quite expensive but worth every nickel!!!
BTW I'm still looking for a "perma-sweetie" for a perma-realtionship SWM 54 in Alabama