paul wheaton wrote:
Roy Sullivan wrote:Think your claim about it cutting it down on oodles of energy from yucky sources might need a line of math/ evidence to support the claim. (E.g when it comes to household electricity bills - heating is the biggest amount)
Hmmm ....
Maybe we need a graphic that shows "the average american carbon footprint" and then an american map that has a big blue zone on the colder parts and then a second footprint graphic that says "the average cold climate american carbon footprint" showing that heat is FAR bigger. And then do the same thing but say "the average cold climate american greenhouse gasses footprint (due to methane leaks from natural gas)" and then yet another graph where the heat is with a rocket mass heater. ??
Andrés Bernal wrote:Option 2:
paul wheaton wrote:
The trick is the candy. We offer heaps of candy because we do it in a way that we can hand it out en masse. But to offer it again and again ... suddenly it isn't as easy to do.
paul wheaton wrote:
I do like the bit about "instincts" --- I think that will probably be the final decision. I am fishing for other bits and bobs I have not yet considered in this otherwise odd decision.
Lol "shooting for two hours"
I think it will be challenging to compress something into two hours.