"So, to summarize this rather long post: in the past, free speech meant you could get on a soapbox in a public space where people congregated and say whatever you liked without being arrested. People could listen or not listen as they chose and be persuaded by your eloquence or throw rotten fruit as they chose. Now, everyone congregates in private spaces - and, increasingly, in private digital spaces. What does that do to the soapbox? Is it lost? Is that a good or a bad thing, and why? If it is bad, is there a way to regain it? And, coming back around to the podcast, is there a way to use the privately owned public squares (aka YouTube) without being overpowered by smell of digital rotten fruit?"
Your entire response is incredibly well thought-out and articulate—thank you so much for sharing your insights!
I feel for Katie, and for everyone who has a thin skin and is afraid of negative responses from trolls and other haters out there. As someone who doesn't have a thin skin in that regard by any stretch of the imagination, I find it difficult to relate to her trepidation. Your soapbox reference comes to mind here, in that I remember walking past soapboxes on street corners and hearing the people on them howling all manner of opinions. They ranged from racist hatemongering to religious fervour and everything in between.
There were people stood around these manic street preachers, and those who walked by without paying them any mind. Some cowered away from the mean things they were saying, others merely shrugged, chuckled at their stupidity, and left knowing that they'd never think about those people again.
We seem to live in an age where there are extreme reactions in all directions. The "good vibes only" crowd can go overboard with silencing and cancelling those whose opinions differ from their own, while hateful bigots will curse and threaten those they deem too different from themselves. Many are quick to insult and criticize—not only what a person's saying, but their appearance, cultural background, vocal inflections, and the like. The middle road of respectfully agreeing to disagree, or constructive criticism without cruelty seems to be quite rare these days.
I don't have an answer for the best course of action either. People have a right to be able to express their opinions, but if those opinions are just mean, then why not keep those ideas to oneself? Before the internet comments section came about, the only time we'd hear vitriolic grumpings about various topics would be from an ornery uncle kvetching about something during a family get together. Now, every single social media post gets inundated with hateful responses from childish, hateful little boggarts from around the world.
I think it's important for people to develop their own set of healthy coping mechanisms so they don't crumple over mean comments. The whole "sticks and stones may break my bones but names will never hurt me" approach and all. That said, having moderators around to reduce the sheer amount of hatred and stupidity frothed in one's direction can go a long way towards maintaining good mental health.
Is there a middle road that one can walk, here?