Tim
Wood-Framed Shear Wall Construction; An Illustrated Guide by Thor Matteson
This is not a direct fit, but the guy writes in English (mostly) and doesn't waste words. It contains a lot of building weight information about wood frame construction. Search around for forums and articles by this guy and you'll probably find a lot of the info in the book available
online. But it's worth the trouble to get an inter-library loan if you can. It also discussed in great detail the forces present in wood frame buildings and how these forces can/are transferred to the ground. Although not directly addressing your design, the thought processes and examples may help in figuring out how to think about the problem and what to look for.
There is, of course, a lot of other engineering info out there.
The picture/diagram comment was spot on. It's the difference between confusing and absolutely opaque. <g> Sketchup has a nasty learning curve but it's free and does the job as well as anything else you get for less than $5-10k.
Nobody can recommend anything specific with the info you provide, although it's clear you've spent a lot of thought on it and clearly have investigated at some length. Even w/your detailed diagrams, nobody can say anything because we can't see the actual site and be sure it's like we think it is and there isn't anything just outside the picture or around the corner that would stop the show. I mean no offense and I suspect if you've been in the trades you've experienced the same problem: "Lady, I have to SEE it before I can give your a price!"
That said, here are a few thoughts:
1) Sean's point about combining two different systems hits the spot. It might not be immediately intuitive but there is a LOT of detail in any even slightly complex system. The reason a system is considered reliable is because a lot of people over a long period of time have messed things up over and over again until everybody has figured out what details are Bad and what details are Good and how to make them play nice. They have got in the habit of recognizing the bad and doing the good. Ie. Long track record. Right. You already knew that. But here's the thing. The good habits and automatic insight people have gained about the one system or another - they don't apply when two different (reliable, tested, well understood) systems meet. All a sudden you have a fault line where two systems meet and that line is clotted with hundreds, even thousands, of details which nobody has had experience with before. No "real world" tests, no hundreds of smart guys making it work, failing and fixing it and getting smarter. You're effectively the pioneer here. And I think you know that figuring it out ahead of time.... Isn't even a close 2nd to thousands of successful examples well tested with the bugs worked out. Can or do you want to afford to be the pioneer here, if you don't have to be?
2) The PSP system is effectively untested compared with standard construction, so add that factor into the fault line between two different systems. You don't have two well tested fully understood systems. One of them is, relatively speaking, almost completely unknown. That is not good for your odds. Note I'm not saying that a lot of thought hasn't gone in PSP; not saying there are not outstanding examples of success. There just aren't _millions_ of examples with 100 millions of hours of engineering and testing behind them. You don't sound like you want to bankroll any testing - I sure wouldn't.
3) If you do a quick and dirty estimate of a standard construction solution, then double it, then factor in time, code compliance, resale value etc... The standard solution might start to look better and better price-wise.
OK, thought specific to your project:
1) First thought I had reading your description: Find out for SURE what's holding up that house! Especially the back part that you're playing with, but all of it really. Light under the length of the rim joist? Or the sill? Bugger. Find out what supports what! Then (if you haven't done it already) poke around _carefully_ at the bottom of the supporting member(s) and see how much it scares you. What's under there and how deep does it go? Basic stuff, like I said - just my first thought. But it tells you what you must support for absolutely sure before you start if you want things above your head to stay there in the same position as always. If there is one 2x rim joist floating above the sill and holding up 8 floor joists toe nailed into it with a wall above... You might, depending on the size of that rim joist, want to give it a little... no, a LOT of help pretty quick. But maybe there's other things that need more help first... Check.
2) Along the same lines: Is the existing structure (above the foundation) sound? My sister's 100 year old 3 story house has 30% or more of the main floor joists splitting and some have sagged at the split more than 1". I spent several weeks last summer dealing with it as part of other work in progress. What has lasted until now undisturbed may not last once you start to shake it's world. If the existing structure doesn't look peachy, that's probably the 2nd thing to fix (after making sure you floor isn't walking on air). Put in sisters, use some steel ties (in the way they're designed for), add blocking to transfer some load... Ah. Transfer load. Say that again. Transfer... Where is that load going? Make sure that _where_ you transfer that load to is sound - don't have something failing at the other end of the house bring your end to ruin.
3) Clay... Water... Water is not your friend here. A good long rain could, like, reshape your world. Probably want to plan for that.
4a) Privacy. Depending on your site it might make sense to do some tasteful, natural landscaping as a first step.
4b) Neighbors. Long thoughtful moment here. Anything you can do or not do to ensure they absolutely are not involved and that their not-involved feeling is all good will - is probably worth it. Truly. You have no idea... Or maybe you do. Anyway. Neighbors.
If I had to bet. I'd say structural cinder block with rebar in it or just plain old ferro cement might be your winning system. However. It might be interesting to study your
local permit records at your building department or, better if you're lucky, at the library or somewhere. Or go visit the next county where the ground is the same but the people are not. Access to the documents varies by district and bureaucrat. You're looking for jobs that involved foundation work like you're thinking of and which have plans and possibly engineering documents and inspector's comments. When reviewing foundation work for a friend of mine in San Francisco we were lucky enough to find a nearby neighbor that had done similar work. There were plans and PE documents on file the described a type of clay that likes to swell and shrink with moisture changes. Standard foundations w/footing were not acceptable in that area - it required concrete posts sunk a certain depth connected by grade beams carrying the load. We got a heads up that saved us a lot of time and angst. That was a special case. The idea is that taking a quick look around the local info sources might bring in some good nuggets.
Last but not least. The more informed (friendly) eyes looking at your site the better. I'm not dumb or careless but I've had my bacon saved several times by others who reviewed the job and immediately saw stuff that I'd just plain missed. Get somebody on site to critique your ideas and your job as you go along, if at all possible. An anal retentive hyper active sour puss would be perfect. <g>
Sean said it - houses are real heavy. Oversights, miscalculations and mistakes happen. Count on it. Have the next layer of safety always there. Redundancy is good. Overbuilding is good insurance. Before you get going underneath it, see if you can arrange for that house to _have to_ standup straight even if you vaporize that foundation all the way around the porch! This is not your day job. You have no reflexes, no moves, no instincts about foundation work. You're making it up as you go; that's as bleeding edge as it gets. Paranoia and old lady fussiness and deep and abiding suspicion are you best friends.
Rufus