posted 11 years ago
There are no hard rules, only generalized recommendations. The 10-12% is a good one to shoot for on the majority of projects. It can be adjusted up or down depending on the details. The solid wall area is important for structural strength. "Shear" strength is the main engineering characteristic that walls with a lot of windows need to pay attention to. Its possible to use a higher engineered solution like steel or simpson strong panels to make up for the lack of wall area but the most affordable way is to leave some south wall areas un-glazed and increase the standard framing connections for the smaller areas of solid wall. In my article I point to the corners and stairwells as being the most attractive locations for solid wall area.
Iam going to take the high road and advise you to check your window selection in RESFEN, a software program used for selecting windows. NE OK is in building climate zone 3 very close to 4. The 2012 IECC calls for prescription minimum Uvalues of .35 in zones 3 and 4. The code also says max SHGC of .35 (.4 for zone 4). The performance path allows high shgc windows with higher Uvalues but .47 is pretty low performance. SHGC of .61 is really good (for whole window) but doubt its a good balance. It would probably be better to have a lower SHGC if you can improve the Uvalues by a third which is much closer to typical passive solar windows.
"If you want to save the environment, build a city worth living in." - Wendell Berry