The hypocaust began as a public luxury, eventually exported to private homes. The earliest examples appeared in the great bath complexes (thermae) of the late republic and early empire. Roman baths were vast public leisure centres and required consistent, large-scale heating.
...
“To have a hypocaust system in one’s house was a big sign of wealth. It would generally only have been present in examples of really opulent and wealthy dwellings: dwellings that, for example, might have their own private bathhouses.[/url]
No, it wasn't efficient and did take a lot of resources. There were a lot of ways they could have made it more efficient. But, it was also a thing for the wealthy, to show how rich they were.
Burra Maluca wrote:Possibly discussion of toxic gick, artificial fertilier, that sort of stuff, which is a strict no-no here.
r ransom wrote:
I've been very down on myself and my painting this week. The better I am at copying masterworks, the worse I feel about composition skills. I need to spend a few months focusing on this skill.
So, with the understanding that i will probably fail, maybe that freedom could help me try and paint the death of rats?