In the study, the nurse trees/bushes were planted 3 feet from each pecan, on either side of the row. The rows were 14.7 feet apart. The nurse crops were coppiced 4 years after planting. I wonder if that three foot distance was chosen with a real-world scenario in mind, or simply for the purposes of the experiment. It just seems really close, even though they were pruned to a single dominant stem. That leads me to think that if I'm going to let the pecans grow without doing any 'shaping' pruning that if emulating this study, I'd have to go from 3 feet apart, to either 6 or 9. On the other hand, looking at Lawton's forest
gardening dvd, his nurse crops seem to be about 3 feet or so from his fruit trees.
Do you, (or anyone else reading this) think it'd work to plant the nitrogen fixing bushes 3 feet from the pecans, the nurse trees 6 feet, and another at 12 feet, 18 etc, filling in between the rows of pecans? As the pecans grow and need the space, (or as I need to supress grass growth) I could 'sacrifice' the very closest nurse trees, and bushes or at least heavily coppice them. If this doesn't seem sound, what would you recommend?
My tentative species list for nurse trees right now are...
*range of planting distances recommended for these are 20-30 feet apart.
speckled alder (planted on the south-west side)
poplar (planted on the northwest side) (I realize it only fixes nitrogen into its stem and not roots but they grow like crazy on the land here, with hundreds to transplant)
kentucky
coffee (planted on south-east side)
Bushes are..
redbud
dogwood
buffaloberry