posted 13 years ago
After coming across the concept of hugelkultur, getting excited, researching it, and drawing up my gameplan I have found that there are a few things left unanswered for me. Mainly the relationship between the use of apparently allelopathic trees and the fertility of a hugelbed. I know not to use the cedar on my property, but the bulk of what i have to use is coniferous(lodgepole, ponderosa, douglas fir, western white pine, mountain hemlock, western larch, englemann spruce) and paper birch being my only hardwood. The birch is my top choice, I have lots of rotted pieces around. I also have an abundance of rotting logs on the forest floor, freshly fallen trees, and lots of slash piles from the last few years collected by the previous owner. Basically I am just trying to fine tune the building of my hugel beds, and I don't want to screw them up by adding too much of the wrong thing.....
My questions are:
-Are all conifers allelopathic? I was not able to find any scientific or research references on the topic, just mentions on blogs, howto's, forums, etc...
-Which parts of a conifer contain the most allelopathic compounds?
-How long before these compounds break down? Does the quality of your "micro-herd" effect the breakdown speed?
-What about green needled fresh limbs, helping or harming the cause?
-What about building a hugel bed over unpulled stumps, basically incorporating them into the bed. Any problems with this?(No risk of resprouting with the conifers i believe)
Anyone with any experience or knowledge regarding these issues please speak up, I would really appreciate it!