Win a copy of The Tourist Trail this week in the Writing forum!
  • Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
permaculture forums growies critters building homesteading energy monies kitchen purity ungarbage community wilderness fiber arts art permaculture artisans regional education experiences global resources the cider press projects digital market private forums all forums
this forum made possible by our volunteer staff, including ...
master stewards:
  • Nicole Alderman
  • r ranson
  • Anne Miller
  • paul wheaton
  • Joseph Lofthouse
  • Jocelyn Campbell
  • Mike Jay
garden masters:
  • Steve Thorn
  • Dave Burton
  • Joylynn Hardesty
  • Carla Burke
  • Pearl Sutton
  • Greg Martin

honey and wind-pollinated allergens

Posts: 169
Location: Emporia, KS
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Most of us have heard the claim that you can suppress your allergies to plants that grow in your area by eating honey that was made from those plants. The logic goes that the bees harvest the nectar and pollen, and in the process of making it into honey, somehow the allergens become harmless to the body so that the immune system gets used to them and doesn't overreact when they later enter the nose and eyes.

I have one question: what about wind-pollinated plants? Ragweed, for instance, is not pollinated by bees. Does honey work on ragweed allergies? If so, presumably the bees are not responsible; the pollen is just falling into the honey by accident, and we could reduce allergies to other things by just mixing them into honey ourselves. If honey doesn't work on ragweed ("generally considered the greatest allergen of all pollens" according to Wikipedia), then that's a major blow to the marketing claim about honey's effectiveness on allergies. Which is it?
Mother Tree
Posts: 11006
Location: Portugal
dog duck forest garden tiny house books wofati bike bee solar rocket stoves greening the desert
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Bees collect nectar from insect-pollinated plants to make their honey from, picking up some of the plants pollen as they do so. But they also collect pollen from wind-pollinated plants. I've no idea how much of that ends up in the honey, but there is a thriving business locally of collecting pollen from the pine and eucalyptus plantations. Special 'traps' are set at the hive entrances so that the pollen that the bees have gathered and stuffed into their pollen sacs is scraped off as they squeeze through the bars.

I wonder if it would be better to buy local pollen and eat it? Or would that trigger the allergies too much?
Posts: 3478
Location: woodland, washington
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
a couple of things: bees do visit some wind-pollinated plants to collect pollen. pollen is a vital part of their diet. I don't know if ragweed is one they forage or not, but it wouldn't surprise me.

also, I believe the mechanism for local honey helping with allergies is that consuming something orally has a tendency to shut down allergic reactions in a lot of cases. if our bodies attacked every foreign substance that entered out bodies through our mouths, we wouldn't last long, so the oral route is a trigger for immune responses to stand down. doesn't always work, and it obviously doesn't apply to food allergies. so perhaps eating raw ragweed pollen would help allergies, though eating local honey with ragweed pollen in it sounds a lot more appealing.
It's weird that we cook bacon and bake cookies. Eat this tiny ad:
Switching from electric heat to a rocket mass heater reduces your carbon footprint as much as parking 7 cars
  • Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
Boost this thread!