Well, it's still essentially a tent and I suspect it will function best as a tent. The two inch wool felt is cozy. I worry that adding sponginess and thickness would affect the way the structure sheds
water, the way it breathes, and the way it dries itself out. Yes to sealing the bales up.
It's small volume, minimal surface, round, not much mass.. takes very little to heat it, despite not being efficient in terms of insulation.
I have two winter's living now in a 144 square foot stick frame cabin that is poorly insulated with big windows, lots of surface area to volume and a drafty door. The stove is 1940's
cast iron. It takes very little
wood to stay warm all winter. But there is a real problem managing temperature. Half a stick is the difference between comfortable and sauna. The small fire goes out after you crawl in bed and by morning the peanut butter and
coffee press are frozen solid.
What I'm hoping for the yurt is to get enough mass in a heater to dampen out the big temp swings.
I will be cooking on a two burner propane with
oven for now. In my cabin cooking on the woodstove doesn't work well, as a fire hot enough to cook on is hot enough to cook you out of the cabin. I would expect the same in the yurt, unless I could decrease general radiant output except for one hot spot for cooking.
Thanks Andrew...what do you mean by floor furnace and massless RMH? I was imagining heating a floor mass.
Eliminating the exchange duct altogether sounds like it could just be a pocket rocket. All radiant. That actually might not be a bad choice for the structure, but I really do want to dampen the temperature swings.
Running flue gas through two or more bells in the floor and then up sounds like what I have had in mind initially...but I don't know what you mean by 'bell'...this is something other than a linear flow through a duct?
Bottom line, if my G.F. can wake up in the morning without frost on the sleeping bags I win....