posted 1 year ago
Ok, so a bit elementary, but I have a theory that might be true or it might not even matter.
So, I know that everyone says to use the center section of kernels in a given cob for seed. Logic says that those kernels are the most consistent in size for mechanical planters, so that's what we use right? Well, if you are not using a planter, and have the ability to simply plant the seed by hand, why not use the bottom kernels as well? I understand the tip kernels usually have bug damage or mold issues & are smaller, so we avoid them. That makes sense to me. As I was going through some of my cobs, it is very clear that some of those very bottom of the ear kernels are almost twice the size of the average center of the ear kernels.
To me that sounds like more "stuff" the seed has to survive on in storage for potentially longer viability, or a stronger start upon sprouting. Do larger corn seeds have a longer shelf life than smaller ones, or does it matter?
My real theory, now that I've said all that, is if ears of corn generally fill out from bottom of the ear to tip, couldn't you theoretically "edge" a given population toward earlier maturing over the course of decades by planting a select plot of bottom row only kernels, saved & replanted year after year? I know we're talking maybe a few hours of advancement each year, but over time would this be possible?
To visualize it a different way, imagine a mixed up stand of corn with 1,000 plants that all let their pollen fly within say a 20 day window on a typical year (just an example). Now, as soon as you first see pollen releasing from any of the tassels, you go in & detassel the entire plot of 1,000 plants. At this point, you've effectively only allowed the earliest of your population to reproduce seed. Of course, this way you won't have a usable harvest, but do this year after year, & in 10 years, how much to the left has the scale of maturity slid?
For someone with the room to do so, it would be a neat experiment to try a bottom row only plot of seed with the same genetics as the middle of the ear standard "Control" group for a few years to see what happens.
Anyone else have weird theories or experience to add?
Dirty hands + a sweaty handkerchief = hope for the future.