Dale Ziemianski wrote:Thanks.
So I was wondering... Does water do a better job of maintaining a livable temperature than, say, earthbags?
Water has a high specific heat capacity (ability to store heat per unit mass)
from
Rain or Shine by Tyson Ochsner
Soil constituent | Thermal conductivity | Density | Specific heat |
---|
| W m-1 °C -1 | g cm-3 | J g-1 °C -1 |
---|
Clay minerals | 3 | 2.65 | 0.76 |
Soil organic matter | 0.3 | 1.3 | 1.9 |
Water | 0.57 | 1.00 | 4.18 |
From that reference the soil's heat capacity is also dependent on it's water content.
I'm not sure how the soil density might affect the heat capacity too. Water is a contiguous material,being a liquid, whereas soil has air gaps in between the particles so it's actual
energy storage wouldn't be as high as the figures above suggest.
One disadvantage of water perhaps is that it doesn't have any insulative value? convective currents would spread the heat through the liquid. But that would also mean it is more effective at storing the heat; spreading it thought the mass rather than only heating the surface of the material as soil might do.
It's fairly common to use a 'water wall' in a thermal store for a
greenhouse. I'm not sure what other disadvantages might be? As long as you use a good container....