It is well known that
ash is strongly alkaline; why is this so, when the
wood or other material it is derived from is not?
If I spread a foot of wood chips over a piece of
land, it wouldn't alkalinize it; if anything, it might have a slight acidifying effect. Over time, the
carbon in the wood chips will escape into the air as carbon dioxide, and the minerals (calcium, potassium, etc.) will be left in the soil.
If I burned that same foot of woodchips to ash, the carbon would burn off as carbon dioxide, leaving an ash of minerals; when this ash is applied, it alkalinizes the soil.
The eventual outcome seems to be the same; decomposition is just slow burning. Why does one route alkalinize the soil, and the other does not?
Two related questions: is this because, when people apply ash, they are applying a far higher level of these minerals than they would feasibly be able to apply in wood chips?
Over time, will the alkalinizing effects of the ashes be neutralized in the soil, returning the pH back to what it would have been if the wood was applied without burning?