posted 1 week ago
Well, I've been in KY a couple of months now looking at a few dozen properties, large parcels for a community and small parcels on which I can go it alone, and most of them have been a waste of gas. Sellers all think their few acres of dirt is worth millions, but the potential return on investment just isn't there. Everything in my price range has been in need of major rehab (some are tear down and start over). A lot of really abused houses or mobile homes with ramshackle barns and outbuildings, overgrown grass and brush, and poorly maintained woods. Most I wouldn't even make a lowball offer on because I could see years of work before I could produce anything of value. And I'm getting too old for that.
Then a couple of weeks ago I came across a brand new listing that is a gem. Only 4+acres, but fairly flat with a small pond, clean woodlot, garden area, some silvopasture, small hayfield, well-maintained mobile or manufactured home (MH) with additions on two sides (more square footage than I need really), septic, county water, electric, and fiber optic Internet access, a large workshop and several other outbuildings. Compared to other properties I'd checked out, it was underpriced and well within my range. Not big enough to start a community on, but enough to keep me busy puttering in a garden and building stuff like chicken coop, goat shed, fencing, etc. I immediately put a full-price offer on it before anybody could beat me to it.
Then I applied for financing with a lender who had already preapproved me for more than I needed. In two days I was approved subject to an appraisal coming in at or more than the contract price. I had no doubt that it would. I was thrilled and started making plans for the many projects I envisioned.
Then the lender wanted a HUD certificate for the MH. There wasn't one. The sellers had inherited the property and knew nothing about it. The decedent had bought it for cash many years ago and hadn't received or asked for a title or anything, just a deed for the land. The county assessor's office had the buildings classified as real estate and assessed it for property taxes. It wasn't registered with the DMV as a MH which would be personal property tax, not real estate tax.
Then the lender informed me that I had to have insurance on the property effective as of the closing date and a year and 3 months worth of premiums deposited into their escrow account. There are only a few companies that insure MHs. I contacted two of them and got quotes and applied with one. The lender's estimate for cost of insurance was about $700 a year. The policy I was issued was more than $1,600. I requested they lower the coverage to just the value of the buildings since the land was not insurable and drop the optional coverages. That got it down to $1,200 a year. I submitted the policy to the lender.
So next the lender asked for an engineering report to certify that it was on a permanent foundation (which it appeared to be). The engineer said he was unable to access the crawl space under the MH portion and didn't see any tie downs normally attaching a MH to the ground. Well, NO, there wouldn't be if the manufactured home (not a mobile home) had been secured directly to the solid block foundation and bolted down like a stick-built house before the additions were added. There were no wheels or axles or tongue, so I suspect the structure had been lifted with a crane and lowered onto the prepared foundation. One of the additions has a partial basement / storm cellar. The ridge line and eaves are straight and level, and the floors are all solid and level, so I'm sure it was constructed properly. But the lender has federal rules to follow pertaining to MHs, and wouldn't budge unless I or the seller install tie downs.
Now the lender wants me to up the insurance coverage to full replacement value (of a new MH plus additions and other outbuildings) rather than just the purchase price. I'm putting 50% down and only asking for a 50% loan, so if the building were destroyed by fire or tornado or whatever, the current policy would provide enough to pay off the loan balance and demolish the buildings to rebuild on the lot, and I could get a construction loan for that. But the lender wants me to spend my money for more coverage than I need. It's not only frustrating, but disconcerting.
Over the past two weeks I've gotten quite an education on financing MHs. It is nothing like financing for regular homes, which I've been through many times over the past 50 years. Higher rates, fewer lenders, lots of rules and regulations. I checked with several other lenders and they all said it was next to impossible to get financing for a MH that had been modified. I think everything possible has been done to keep people from buying "affordable" housing.
If I had the cash to close without a loan, I'd do it in a heartbeat, but I don't have enough. So, I'm going to sit down with the seller and his agent to propose seller financing though he has already said he wouldn't, and I hope that his real estate agent doesn't have a backup offer from a cash buyer who won't have to deal with a conventional lender.
Nothing is ever easy. But hopefully it will all work out. Wish me luck.