J Argyle wrote:
Have you ever received any grants for water? (conservation, management, etc.) Is so, have you run into issues with state government not working with the federal government?
I am looking to address riparian issues within a possible design for some land I am looking at. The State Land Commission is requiring me to pay them for an environmental study before I even begin. Even if the state green lights my project the federal government can say no to my project. In your experience would it be better to not apply for any grants that might involve the federal government, and keep it at a state level?
This is an interesting, but rare conundrum. I looked into doing a riparian "re-wilding" for the creek that runs through my farm. It was once a winding, slow, tapered-bank trout stream. Then some idiot in the early 70s decided he'd bulldoze the entire thing and "straighten it out" so it could be row-cropped right up to the bank. The banks are now heavily incised, and the root balls of trees are eroded as fast as they can establish themselves. Something must be done, and I'm working to improve all the factors I can influence on my own farm.
Here's a GIF of Versaland through the years. Look at the changing shape of the creek in the right of the aerial image.
I did some homework and learned I'm in a similar situation. The Feds and State all have a convoluted handshaking dance that must be done before a farmer can move soil on their own farm.
In short, the Army Corps of Engineers (Federal) and the Iowa Department of Natural Resources (State DNR) would both have to approve of stabilizing and reshaping the streambank - to put it back where it was just 30 years ago.
Is it worth navigating a bit of bureaucracy to save a resource? YES!