Blendi Kraja : Thank you for the additional clarification ! I see some problems with your Feed stock and your design. Plese note that after 20+ years of a more
or less static design, multiple changes have /are happening, and we are All open to ''Think Outside the Box " Efforts.
I for one like wood chips as bio-fuel for large fluid bed Power station/heating plants, But
I Believe that in an effort to be more
Sustainable the Ramial mass,
the high nitrogen content, the leaves, twigs, and branches are best recycled back into the ground !
I am sure in your present location you are familiar with Coppice-ing and Pollard-ing. With most of the wooden fuel in the 10cm to 20cm range the amount of handling,
labor and use of power equipment Increases rather than Decreases the amount of inputs and missed recycling opportunities /Sustainability!
We will have to discuss a little history to be fair to your design!
A ) One of the best points of a
Rocket Mass Heater RMH of the traditional Vertically fed J-bend type is its ability to be easily fed over a short 1hour period and
the having 12-24 hours of Heat
Energy Stored within its thermal mass! Truly it is this constantly radiated Heat Energy without the further wood burning of big box
wood stoves that provides the 10 Xs wood fuel savings . Only in Extreme cold climates, or Attempting to heat too large an area with too little of a Rocket are long
burns truly needed !
The horizontally loaded and fired L Batch box style allows for a single larger fuel load that can be burned faster, this can reduce the size of the entire unit.
Depending on Build specifications this can give more prompt heat, or slowly released heat through one or more bells .
Each model has different combustion core area characteristics to cleanly combust their wood gases!
Your wish for a
RMH that could be started on sticks and then converted to wood chunks would seem to require Two
differently designed Combustion areas for burning
the two different materials. I am afraid that any type of compromise combustion chamber would be just that -a compromise !
I Think that this will add greatly to the complexity of designs that are loved for their simplicity .
This is also how I feel about a mechanical wood chip delivery system, too complicated and creating additional wear and tear on the Fuel Feed Area .
As I stated before " Wood chip trials actually proved to be too Labor /Energy intensive " ( though you may have better luck )
-it is also possible that I have again totally missed your goals ! For the good of the Crafts ! Big AL