I'm slightly familiar with the NRCS grants to landowners for forestry management (wildfire mitigation) from helping a friend fulfill the terms of her grant a couple winters back. Some NRCS employees have also been very helpful with information about fire recovery, and active in discussions of permaculture/fire-wise design strategies.
However, there's a bit of a problem in the
PDC system, and in some government agencies, where folks with limited experience can get their certificate / get hired to give advice to others. In government agencies, it is not so much the shallow or limited experience, as it is a person getting hired in from out of the area and maybe giving advice based on a different region or climate - or very broad guidelines that are one-size-fits-all.
And then you have a "permaculture designer" with a 2-week qualification who is good at marketing themselves, competing with someone with 20+ years' experience in managing for local issues.
One thing I've noticed about all these grants and assistance programs is that it seems to take a few years (or forever) for folks starting up on their land to realize these resources are available. If they have already set a lot of things in
concrete, it's not as easy to do a complete design; or more to the point, many PDC courses do not really take into account how to work with existing infrastructure.
Permaculture design services are useful at any point, but might also be particularly useful at a larger scale, or as part of the resources offered to new land buyers.
Maybe a way to mitigate this would be a two-fold approach:
1) go ahead and offer some level of support for those interested in getting a permaculture design review of their property.
I like the idea of grants for hiring a local consultant; there are a lot of farmers here who help each other find local funding and creative,
sustainable land-management support. Permaculture designers could be one category; experienced organic farmers might be another; century farms might be another.
I think it could be worth allocating some funding for NRCS staff to take their PDCs, not necessarily to start doing permaculture plans right away, but it could be very useful in general for the work they already do for other kinds of planning, and for evaluating local resources and consultants in the local area.
2) Consider offering some kind of support or recognition for established sites, which have been sustainably farmed over a longer number of years.
Maybe NRCS doesn't fund the initial experiment, but puts out a call for examples of long-running personal "experiments" like soil restoration, water retention, intensive/regenerative grazing management, etc.
Could be a competition with prizes, for "model farms" of several different categories. (Regenerative forestry; polycrop food production; wildlife habitat (woodland/meadow/wetland/scrub); regenerative stock/grazing management; mixed-use or integrated management; "hobby farms" or cottage business (B&B, craft products, etc.)).
Could be case-study grants for documenting longer-term experiments such as productivity/pest-resistance of polycrops, water retention strategies, non-invasive groundcovers and mulches, soil-building and fire recovery, or other innovative systems.
Could be small grants for documentation of long-standing farms recognized as "Model land stewards" for specific climates and regions. (i.e. there should be at least 3 to a dozen examples in each "locality," showing different but excellent ways to develop and regenerate fertile landscapes).
In any of these case study/competition type options, if there are more than a few applicants per year, the scores could be determined on a combination of NRCS mission objectives and permaculture design principles.
Since the best knowledge of what works for a given region or microclimate is going to be developed on the ground, over time, recognizing those good stewards could counterbalance the tendency for a larger institution to mis-apply "one-size-fits-all" models. Lots of novice permaculture people only get as far as an herb spiral and some swales or
hugel beds - all techniques that assume a "blank slate" of unspecified land. Learning which methods actually improve the local landscape would be a valuable undertaking, worth partnering with established farmers to pursue.