Hi Paul. Yeah, base isolation is to go if you want to limit the vibrations. It creates a "soft" layer that deforms and absorbs the vibration
energy. It is extensively used in seismic designs (especially in Japan) and vibration control for foundation design (like under heavy stationary machinery). How much it might help the specific problem, I don't know for sure. Base isolation may increase the initial cost up to 10-30%, so it usually not used for ordinary structures, like houses, apartments etc. It is also a "new" subject for seismic design ( or any design that puts a soft layer in between), so there is a lot to be done. I don't think there is a research going on about "light" structures under influence of rail road vibrations or any other vibration for that matter.
Here is a
video link:
Tough we can always roll the dice
Things come to mind:
-One should separate the structure completely from the foundation. Structure should rest on "rubber" (elastomer bearing as it is called) and that to the foundation. But it does creates some problems. The basement slab that rests on bearings should be very stiff/rigid (2 m/6 ft thick basement slabs are quite common). For this case basement beams should be larger than regular, and have diagonals (like we do in vertical, between columns).
-Wooden cabin is way to light to withstand wind, moreover we are isolating the structure in this case. Usually structures are so heavy, they don't jump or tip over or similar. So there should be a safety mechanism to hold the structure if there is a vertical movement.
-Using tires is cost wise, but it is not common. So it will respond how? Another question here. Larger the tyre the better, but not that sure also.
I made some sketches just for , you know, brain storming. If you end up going for it, please consult some eng. with experience. Hope it helps!
Salim