It is a complex subject and it usually boils down to just how much technology is enough and whether you perceive your use of technology as beneficial to you and your lifestyle and philosophy.
For example, Amazon is built on a tremendous amount of technology - from package management, pricing, sales conduits, deliveries, tracking, inventory, you name it.
Most people who move to a rural area to "homestead" (usually the boonies have less services and shopping opportunities), especially in the first 3-5 years of their homesteading existence - come to rely (or be dependent on) Amazon, Walmart.com or whatever else online shopping tool that provides the best prices and the quickest delivery.
In this instance, these same people would be hard pressed to deride the technology they find beneficial. Even when many of them come to DEPEND on said tools/technologies to survive. That's one extreme, in my mind. In fact, it is a common mistake to
make.
Now, you see a family in the restaurant looking at their individual phones and you immediately think that it is an extreme use of technology because it is impeding family dynamics, disconnecting people, so on and so on. It is an extreme that is negative in your mind.
However, is your dependence on Amazon any better than someone's dependence on their phone?