Peter van den Berg

Scott Weinberg wrote:Please read-  This is only my experince, I am not suggesting or implying your results will be the same.  But without gages, recording, and study, it would only be a great working warm stove.  now it is a on going experiment daily.  

I fully agree. Point is, the guys and girls of the shop have other things to do than to try to get "the most out of it". The place isn't mine, the heater isn't mine, as soon as the work was done it was out of my eager hands. That said, I built up a lot of goodwill, and I am very welcome to bring visitors with me to show the heater, offer them coffee and a chair to "sit by the fire" with me as the proverbial storyteller...

tony uljee wrote:so i can only hope that this will be noticed by other interested companies/customers----who can get Peter to build another stove ---or at least under his guidance-----thankyou  Peter.

Your welcome. Tony. In the mean time, there is a another heater built under my guidance, I am convinced you didn't miss that one. See the  following heater report, which obviously (or at least I hope it does!) bears my signature. This guy did the design himself, I only did steer him in the right direction a number of times.
https://permies.com/t/364721/Transforming-Fireplace-Splendid-Rocket-Mass

Glenn Littman wrote:Magnificent Peter! Congrats on your efforts and creating another masterpiece. Has it been named yet? I'll toss out a few thoughts that come to mind... Godzilla or perhaps Gargantua.

No name so far, not sure it will come that far, to be honest.

Glenn Littman wrote:I didn't see any mention in your build commentary... did you embed any thermocouples in the mass? It would be quite interesting to see what the inside skin temps are running. I actually find that monitoring my inside skin temps helps me to manage the external skin temps better as it will give an advanced idea of system temperature profile.

Yes, that's true, but there aren't any thermocouples in the mass. Running the heater isn't a task of just one dedicated person. Everybody has their own work to do during opening hours, so every now and then somebody shoves a couple of fuel pieces in the firebox. This is how they do it now, that might change when frost kicks in.

Glenn Littman wrote:Once the system is fully dry it will be interesting to know the firing cycles to get it up to temperature and maintain it considering the enormous mass. It will also be interesting to see how it retains the heat over the 35-40 hours that the store is closed and the external temperature when they reopen on Monday.

At the moment, they use the clever thermostat of the gas heater as temperature gauge. It is able to show the temperature over each 24-hour period, hour by hour. So they'll know what temperature decline is going on during closed hours.

Gerry Parent wrote:Question: Curious why the ceiling of the bell had regular bricks instead of firebricks, especially right above the riser exhaust port?

The spot with the highest thermal stress is right opposite the exhaust opening. The ceiling is getting warm, yes, but not overly so. I reckon the surface temperature of the concrete won't get very high, the material sports a relatively high conduction rate. Remember, this is a large heater with lots of space inside. The heat will spread out fairly quickly, to date there is no report of loud BANG! noises, indicating bricks cracking up. The same goes for the small Pepper shaker in my workshop, no frightening noises. The inner wall of the large heater should be hotter than 520 ºC (968 ºF) before the quartz christals are breaking up.

Gerry Parent wrote:Also, I noticed a latch on the door which appears to do something for the air inlet flapper. Is it to lock the flapper closed when the fire is out?

The guy who did the welding rated the work on a decent flap as too complicated and choose to do something else. The latch is a quick bodge to close the flap. Simple, not sophisticated at all. As long as it works, not my choice but it'll be OK.

Cristobal Cristo wrote:Also the dark color of the bell helps with faster heat radiating.

Yes, it helps. But what helps a great deal more is the thermal conductivity coefficient in the concrete clinkers. This is about 2 to 2.5 times greater as compared to hard red brick. Which makes the heater relatively quick responding, despite such a huge mass.

Julian Adam wrote:Incredible result, congratulations Peter & helpers! Are they topping it up all day long to have sufficient heat output? Almost a pity to cover it in clay plaster!

Yes, they are topping it up all day long. Which means it is refilled every 2hours or something like that. At the moment with soft wood fuel, since they have a lot of pallets and crates lying around. Normally, they have to pay for to get rid of the stuff, now it's generating heat. The formerly used cast iron stove couldn't really be run with soft wood at all, far too much hassle.
I agree about he plaster, there's a possibility they'll skip that eventually.

thomas rubino wrote:Wow, Peter!
Shorty Core is sure strutting her stuff as the new kid on the block!
Another outstanding build!
Built to specs and worked right out of the box!
Your living room wall will soon be covered in photos of your builds!

Thanks Thomas, my bedroom walls are already covered with compliments like yours! But... the love of my life do object to having pictures in the living room everywhere, she likes paintings a lot more.

Above the core, construction speed got up, partly because the builders were gradually gaining more experience. First, a photo of the inside of the firebox.



The port is clearly visible on the left. The slanted firebricks aren't mortared in, which works very well because there always needs to be a layer of ash between those anyway.



The stove kept growing bigger all te time.





This is the ceiling height of the bell.



This is the lining on the inside of the bell. This is where the greatest thermal load is expected in the bell, hence the extra protection. As a hindsight, it could have been one brick higher... It's clearly visible that the firebricks are resting on a row of transverse concrete clinkers.





The ceiling height has been reached, and while bricklaying is still underway on one side, the first parts of the ceiling have already laid down on the other.



The supporting structure consists of two heavy gauge L-shaped profiles welded together back to back. The spacing between those was determined by the length of the concrete pavers.



The structure was considered strong enough to support not only many bricks but also the weight of a person.





The entire ceiling layer consists of bricks laid on their sides. These do not rest directly on the steel; a thin layer of ceramic paper is placed between them to separate the steel from the bricks.



A double, overlapping layer of 13 mm superwool is placed on top for sealing. On top of the wool, another layer of paving bricks serves as ballast and a covering for the wool. The entire ceiling and covering layer are laid dry, without mortar.



The last three layers of the outer shell complete the whole, so the entire ceiling structure is out of view.



There was still a lot of pointing to be done, and the chimney hadn't been connected yet. It had to go through the wall and then up, above the parapet of the parking deck.



All the pointing was now finished, and the last cleaning hatch on the left was also in place.



The hole in the wall finished, the connection was next. The chimney of the iron stove will remain in place for a while, until a buyer shows up.



In this photo, the doorframe is finished, the whole thing has been sprayed black with heat-resistant paint, and the heat-resistant glass has been installed in the door. There's some small wood in the firebox, ready for the first fire!

https://youtube.com/shorts/sXPsvK_f2Ak [youtube]https://youtube.com/shorts/sXPsvK_f2Ak[/youtube]

Clearly, with the bypass open, not a speck of smoke coming out of the door.

https://youtube.com/shorts/qLbdnSiaaLE [youtube]https://youtube.com/shorts/qLbdnSiaaLE[/youtube]

That thing is truly outrageously large, there's simply no other word for it.



This photo was taken a bit later; here it's burning at full speed, made possible by the bypass. Everything was still very wet, clearly visible at the bottom, where most of the water is. Because the concrete pavers absorb little water, the drying process was over after just over a week. After that, everything went swimmingly well. It can burn with the door and bypass closed, and still only 90 to 110°C (194 to 230 ºF) in the pipe.



The stove is much drier here; almost all the joints are now much lighter in color. Whether it's big enough to actually keep the shop warm in frosty weather remains to be seen, but right now, they're very happy with it. Even the customers understand that it's something special; compliments and questions are coming in regularly.

Meanwhile, there's no smoke coming out of the chimney; there's only a slight smell outside for about five minutes after lighting, after which it disappears as well.

Although the chimney won't get dirty anytime soon, it still needs to be swept occasionally. The current design allows for sweeping from the parking deck without dismantling anything. Any debris that comes out can easily be removed through the sweeping hatch on the left, under the first piece of black pipe.

A few more figures: for the design, I calculated 1,150 concrete clinkers and 140 hard firebricks. Two firebricks and 27 clinkers remained. The clay/sand mortar weighs 300 kg (661 lbs). The dry clinkers weigh 3.8 kg (838 lbs) each, for a total weight of 4,267 kg (4.7 US tons). The firebricks weigh 2.8 kg (6.17 lbs) each, for a total weight of 386 kg (851 lbs). Plus some loose items, like hatches and steelwork, about 100 kg (220 lbs).

All together: 5053 kg (5.57 US tons). The remaining clinkers and bricks are now on top of the stove; there was the last remaining unused spot. Another 100 kg or so, 5153 kg (5.68 US tons).
And that's not all; the plan is to plaster the outside of the thing. Then there will be hundreds of kilograms of clay plaster added; we might soon be looking at a stove weighing 5.5 tons (6.06 US tons)!

Size of this heater: WxDxH: 175x125x215 cm (5.74' x 4.1' x 7.05'). No small feat (feet?), I dare say.

It was a wonderful project, with a very good result.

thomas rubino wrote:Good Day, Peter;
Gerry and I are wondering what material your core roof is made of.

It's a shelf for a potter's kiln. The Sculpter's shop also sell small kilns and so on, shelfs for the same as well. So they used what was in-house anyway.

Cristobal Cristo wrote:1. It looks like the original riser dimension was 300x300 mm and you lined it to get 200x200 mm. I understand that the port depth was increased from standard 50-65 mm (brick thickness) to 110 mm (or more). The back side of the riser was not lined. Was it intentional? If the back was also lined than the port depth would be reduced by the thickness of the lining.
When Thomas built his shorty he did not line the riser and it looks like it retained its 230x230 mm interior dimension. Is the lining a new development/improvement?

Yes, it was intentional, this was the single configuration that worked best during development. I tried everything I could think of, the liner all around was one of those. Mind you, the liner is reaching just a bit higher than the port, above that it's 290 mm square again. No, it isn't a new development, have a look at the relevant thread: https://permies.com/t/234638/Development-compact-batchrocket-core

I am so sorry, but...  you are mistaken about how Thomas built his Shorty core, there's a liner in there, exactly according to specifications.

Cristobal Cristo wrote:2. What bricks have you used for the firebox walls and for lining?

Hard firebricks, commonly called chamotte bricks over here.

Cristobal Cristo wrote:3. What is the size of the room the heater is located in. Is it 30 m2 or 30x30 m?

It's a shop space of about 30x30 m, together 900 m².