Nicole Alderman

steward
+ Follow
since Feb 24, 2014
Merit badge: bb list bbv list
Biography
Five acres, two little ones, one awesome husband, 12 ducks (give or take), and a bunch of fruit trees and garden beds. In her spare time, Nicole likes to knit, paint, draw, teach kids, make fairies & dragons, philosophize, and read fantasy. She doesn't HAVE spare time, but does like to fantasize about it!
For More
Pacific Northwest
Apples and Likes
Apples
Total received
In last 30 days
72
Forums and Threads

Recent posts by Nicole Alderman

For the first time in years, I applied sunscreen to myself. I'd found (what seemed to be) non-toxic sunscreen at our local Grocery Outlet. It's made by Native (link to the Native Coconut and Pineapple sunscreen I used), which used to make great, natural deodorants. Now, all (except maybe their unscented) deodorants have "fragrance," but they're generally still better than conventional deodorants, so I figured the same would apply to their sunscreen. Not so! Apparently, my body is allergic to it, most likely to the "fragrance" in it, since the other ingredients are not common allergens and fragrances are.

Wednesday was a super hot day, so I took my kids to the lake. I put on sunscreen to keep myself from getting burnt while in the water (gotta be in the water with the kids to make sure they don't drown!). I only applied it on my upper arms, upper chest, upper back, and my face. I figured my legs would be okay, since they were in the water (they got really burnt!).

Everything was fine, and I took a shower after we got home. In the morning, I noticed a slight rash (little red bumps) on my upper chest. I didn't think much of it, and went along with my day. Around 9:00pm, though, my face felt bumpy. When I looked in the mirror, I noticed my face was all bumpy. I don't have acne scars or other pitting, so this was really weird to see. I noticed that everywhere I had applied my sunscreen, I was covered in bumps. My legs were totally fine. My lower arms were fine. It was obviously the sunscreen.

I took a Benadryl and applied Benadryl cream on my neck and face and went to bed. (I didn't realize our Benadryl pills expired 3 years ago. (We obviously don't use them much). I did the same Friday night. Friday morning and night, and this morning and night, I drank tea with turmeric, ginger, licorice, cardamom, dandelion, green tea, black pepper, cayenne and cinnamon--in hopes of reducing inflammation and helping my body clear it out. I also took a really hot, steamy shower in hopes of helping sweat it out. But, I'm still all bumpy. The bumps on my face seem smaller, but that could also be because my face is a bit more swollen.

My husband bought new Benadryl today, so I'll take that tonight. And, I'll make nettle tea and maybe eat some nettles tomorrow. But, I'm honestly not sure how long this rash is going to linger. It doesn't itch--just feels oddly sensitive and bumpy when I touch it. But, it really weirds out my daughter, and she's struggling to sleep because of it, so I'd like it to resolve sooner rather than later!

Any idea how long this will last? Should I go into a doctor? Anything else I should try to help it clear up faster?
8 hours ago
P. Sutin, I can't certify your BB without "dirty napkin basket (with labels)"

Maybe just put a label on it and snap a picture, or write "Dirty Laundry" on the cardboard box with a marker?

You'll notice that I labeled my laundry bag in the first picture. Now that my family is trained, the label is no longer on it....

The label doesn't have to be fancy
9 hours ago
The kids will have had a chance to write/experiment with quills and ink earlier in the school year. I still have alder cone ink left over from my botany class last year (somehow, I lost the alder and walnut ink I made 3 years ago). If I can get  my hands on some more walnuts (maybe someone in my area has oak galls?) I'll make walnut ink, too, for the kids to use. I also still have feather quills from previous years. I should learn to carve the tips better, because my knife wasn't too sharp and they aren't perfect. But, they work for the experience.

So, all the kids should already have had experience with ink and quills. For this medieval book project, I'll probably put out the tannin ink(s) and quills for kids to use, and see if I can borrow calligraphy pens from the art room for kids who want to use those. Many might just write with pencils.

I like the idea of giving the kids lots of choices, especially since I'll be teaching a Kindergarten through 2nd grade class, a 3rd through 5th, and a 6th through 8th. There will be a wide range of skills and interest in those, so I more choices gives me a way to accommodate them all.

A class room of kids and real gold leaf don't go together. Gold leaf is expensive, finicky (you lift it with a gilder's brush that has been made just slightly tacky by the oil in the gilder's hair) and super duper light. The slightest air current will send the gold leaf flying across the class room - I'm visualizing kids trying to catch gold leaf, sending it and many more flying further through the air just by their own movements.



Really good to know!

Instead of using real gold leaf, I'd go for possible different shades of acrylic gold paint (dark, bright, warm, almost silver), and offering the choice between making a slightly domed gesso underground for the 'gilding', doing an under painting in red/ochre/green... and then adding the gold colour. The under painting may/may not add tint to the gilding, depending on the thickness of the gold paint layer.



I'd like to avoid acrylic if possible, simply because it's not a historic medium. But, a gold gouache or watercolor seems pretty close to the gold shell that was historically used, even if it doesn't have actual gold in it. Right now, I'm leaning toward using gold mica, but I haven't experimented with it enough to know how gold it actually looks!
19 hours ago
art

Dian Green wrote:There are few things you can do. One of the bigger issues is if you want the manuscripts to be able to be rolled. If you are willing to keep them flat, you can fairly easily gild.



Their illuminated/gilded work will be in the book they are making, so it should be able to stay flat.

Gold prices are super high. I've barely ever worked with actual gold. Most of what you can get is brass. It looks good but can tarnish over time if it's not sealed.

It makes me wonder if maybe doing a sort of pseudo shell gold with the gold mica (like this one from Earth Pigments), might be a lot easier and won't tarnish. They won't get to burnish it, but it might be easier for them to control, while still being a relatively historic method (just using mica instead of ground gold)

You can cut or break off small pieces that are just a bit bigger that the area you want, use a static charged clean and dry paint brush to move the scrap over and another soft clean brush to smooth it down. It will crumble and brush away where there isn't any glue.



Man, I so want kids to be able to experience this, but I can see a lot of frustration and wasted gold foil. Maybe I could get sheets of the brass as well as the "shell gold" mica and let kids chose.
1 day ago
art
She also shows how to paint with the hand-made shell gold:



Her website also shows painting with mica, but it really doesn't look as nice as the real gold.
1 day ago
art
Here's a video on making shell gold from gold leaf:

1 day ago
art

r ransom wrote:There is an episode of Time Team where the put gold in a manuscript the authentic way.  I cannot remember the episode but most of them are free on yt.

Something in my head says gold looks better when glued onto red.  So paint all the gold places red so you know where to put it.



I watched a video about the red underlaying, too. It helps the gold look more rich. This should be timestamped to when they explain about why they used a red ocher background:



I'm pretty sure there's an episode of BBC's Tudor Farm that does gilding. I'm pretty sure it's Ruth Goodman's husband that does the illuminating of a manuscript.

EDIT: Nope. There is an illuminated manuscript, but it isn't gilded:



1 day ago
art
Digging a little deeper, this site (Arte Illuminandi) says:

For gold powder binding, it is better to use fish glue or glue made from gelatin. Gum Arabic dulls the gold powder.



I also found this fun (and slightly related) tidbit:

The origin of gum Arabic in the Middle Ages was not always clear. Much of what passed under the name gum arabic came from apricot – cherry – or plum trees and was certainly not from ‘Arabia’. Understandably, however, people also used the lesser quality cherry gum because, after all, it was available nearby. Apricot, plum and cherry trees grew in many places.



I've been meaning to use cherry sap gum to make paint, just to see how "inferior" it is. I still haven't gotten around to it, and I won't be using it to do gilding. But, I found it interesting that people did use it in the past!

He also lists some medieval recipes for making gum arabic for gold leaf and for paint. I'm pasting them here so I can find them later!

Gum solution: Recipe for laying gold leaf :

“Take white clean gum Arabic and break it into small pieces or grind it and put it in a glazed dish. And pour enough water over it so that it comes to two fingers deep and let it stand a day and a night and then put it in the hot ash for a while to dissolve and test it just as you tested the “planeerwater’ (2*). And when it is well tempered, such that it is not too strong or too weak, strain it through a cloth and keep it in a bottle and use it.”

From: “De Coloribus Faciendis ” by Jean le Bègue. ( 3*)

Gum solution for the preparation of paint:

“When mixing colors for painting in books, make a binder of the brightest gum arabic and water, as before, and mix it with all colors except green and ceruse (lead white), minium (red lead), and carmine. Salt green is unusable in a book. Spanish green should be made with wine, and if you want to make it darker, add a little of the juice of sword grass, or cabbage, or leeks. You should mix minium and ceruse, and carmine, with egg white”.


1 day ago
art
Doing some searching, I found this write up from the SCA (Society for Creative Anachronism):

The products recommended for use on SCA scrolls, on the grounds of authenticity and durability, are gold gouache, powdered or shell gold, and gold leaf.
There are several varieties of metallic gouache available. For my money, Pelikan Rich Gold is best. Windsor & Newton is rather lifeless and difficult to apply evenly. Pelikan Pale Gold is a bit anaemic, and Pelikan Dark Gold is too coppery in tone. This is only a personal recommendation, please use whatever you like best. The paint should be diluted to a creamy consistency, and stirred constantly to keep the gold from settling out. For the best results, paint the area to be covered with a thin wash, and while this is still wet, flood on a sizeable amount of gouache. The surface tension of the water will distribute the gold evenly, but you might have to tease it carefully into tight corners. When completely dry, polish it with a dog-tooth burnisher, using a circular motion and very gentle pressure. This will smooth down the gouache and give it a nice sheen.
Powdered gold is sold in small quantities, and must be combined with gum arabic and diluted with distilled water before use. It can also be bought ready combined in small dried tablets, which is called shell gold. Powdered / shell gold is applied with a brush like ordinary paint, and when dry has a finely grained, quite dull finish. It can be brightened up quite a lot with burnishing, but is can never quite equal the brilliance of leaf.

Since well applied gold gouache looks very like shell gold (at a fraction of the cost and bother), I tend to stick to that for scrolls, especially for illuminating AA blanks.



But, that doesn't really help with figuring out how medieval people gilded without gold-leaf. Did they use gold goauche?

Looking on Natural Pigment's site, they sell Gold Shell...which costs $128.00 for 0.3 grams. That's too much! But, it also explains that shell gold is just gold dust in gum arabic. Which is a lot like gouache (gouache is watercolor with chalk/calcium carbonate added).

So, buying "gold" gouache might be a reasonable way for kids to historically gild their manuscripts, especially since it seems that gold leaf wasn't used before the 12th century.

Also, if you can attach gold dust to paper with just gum arabic, couldn't you attach gold leaf the same way?
1 day ago
art
This year I'm teaching medieval history, and I'd like to have my students make their own medieval books (making paper, binding them, covering them, illuminating them and maybe even decorating them).

I really want the kids to make their own illuminated letter/illustration with egg tempera, and I think it would be super cool if they could add some gilding. But, I'm getting really confused about how to do that. I see lots of sets for gold leaf gilding (like this one from BLICK), but when I asked if they could be used on egg tempera, I was told,

"The adhesive and sealer in the Mona Lisa Composition Gold Leaf Kit are water-based synthetic products. When applied, they introduce an acrylic/polymer layer onto the surface of your work, which is not usually compatible with egg tempera paintings. Because of this, the manufacturer recommends testing this on a sample of a fully cured egg tempera painting before applying it to a finished artwork."



Well, that won't work. I'm assuming most of these kits, then, probably won't work. They seem largely to be used for gilding objects, like mirror frames and chairs.

Looking into actual historical methods, I see a lot of mentions of gilding on top of gesso. This gives a nice raised finish, but it sounds really finicky. I don't want to deal with that level of chaos and potential for failure!

Can I just apply gold leaf with just gum arabic or gelatin/hide glue?

I also see that "Gold pigment, liquid gold, and shell gold[6] are the simplest methods of illumination, and represent the earliest occurrence of gold in manuscripts.[7] Gum, glair, or size provide suitable gold-grain binders. A small brush applies the mixture—technically comparable with watercolor painting. Although this method works well on rough vellum, burnished grains produce dull illumination.[8] Shell gold, acceptable for lettering or small accents, is not recommended for major work." (according to Natural Pigments' website).

Are those harder or easier to apply? I'm struggling to find much info on this subject.
1 day ago
art