M4F 46, passionate, somewhat disabled, stubborn, semi-ineffectual permaculturist, writer and composer. On 4 acres in New England closish to a major city. I have another profile on permies and for my privacy I prefer to keep my real name private for the moment, it doesn’t seem wise to put one’s real name out there on the internet for dating reasons.
The ugly: I am still living with my ex who broke up with me six months ago. Disentangling the ownership of the house is beyond our financial capacity, even if we can work as a team on this, and her low energy and mine plus caregiving my elderly mother and other obstacles is slowing things. And we have not made the separation public yet because of her. Is this messy? Sure. Is it a red flag? Maybe. At least a dark pink hue. But there’s a lot of other green flags around it (scroll down).
I am ethically non-monogamous. I will not be negotiated out of this.
I do not want to have children unless very rigorous conditions are met, and it may be a long time; I’m willing to accept just never having children rather than break my boundaries. If you already have a child or children I do not have the capacity to take on a father role. I do care about children, though, and that’s a big part of why I wouldn’t want to take on a responsibility I couldn’t handle. I can barely handle the homestead.
Being connected to community is important and I would love to say I’m a great community builder—but I’m mediocre at best. My local townsfolk are generally kind, mostly, but not very collapse-aware or oriented to the big picture issues. It’s been hard to get people coordinated—especially since my ex is very shy (maybe overly cautious) about having people over. I see it as our security lies in trying to form a working relationship before times get tough, she saw it differently.
I have a flock, fencing, hugelkultur, some food forest started, calorie nuts, mulberries and stonefruit, mature pruned apples and seed-started on the way, water is from a well but roof collection supplement for the animals and in drought for plants (the goal is to stop needing to irrigate).
I’m a huge Paul Wheaton nerd, and I agree with most of his unpopular opinions, but I also favor the more purple side of Sepp Holzer and others, and Fukuoka is a beacon. If you vehemently hate Paul Wheaton, it might be a very toxic interaction. Exciting but probably not engaged in for the healthiest of reasons. Also, why not give Paul another chance? I find most people who disparage his views haven’t actually understood his points or tried the experiment. Let’s have some more listening.
I thrive on community. I’m either too lazy or too lonely to do a lot of tasks that better homesteaders do, but I will do more if there’s a group to do it for or with. I will want to have people over for work parties. Or more people move in to lower costs. And have dinner with those people often. But not always. I will also want solo time.
I don’t always know how I feel about a decision in the moment, so I may say, “ask me again,” and never have an answer. Which essentially makes it a no.
I’m hard to love but if you’re the rare person who feels it’s worth it then I guess you won’t mind the brambles.
You:
ideally you have some homesteading experience too but more important is the real desire to become self-sufficient foodwise and energy wise, and willingness to communicate, continue growing, and ask for help. Besides that, a $5million portfolio, beach house in Aruba, and a name on the building of some research university is must. Any university is fine, as long as it is Ivy League, and not Brown. Brown is. . .Brown is not OK. And being able to drive stick—excavator that is. I don’t know, you’re just you. I guess I’d love it if you’re able to do intuitive work but I find everyone I’ve been in a relationship can, they just may not have tried it for whatever reason and they’re always immediately better at it than me. That’s where I find really good teamwork can arise.
The homestead:
It’s too expensive, it’s a good stepping-stone homestead for building some equity and getting out of the city, having a roadside farmstand and that sort of thing, but then it’s got too high a toxic load, too high taxes, too much house, too much regulation, etc., that anyone would really try to forever homestead here. Unless of course the system collapses and then all that changes—but it would still be pretty flat, which makes it more valuable for a lot of other uses than permaculture. It’s a compromise house, in other words, and after it’s been owned 5 years it should be sold to another group exiting the city. (If you’re a part of that couple/thruple/group but not interested in going on a date with me, also please get in touch).