J.P. Waters wrote:In the Siri-Testimony PDF document.....
I recall similar statistics in the book I referenced above. It is a hard copy so I do not have the ability to copy and paste. The link was similar in that the statistics showed a direct link to increased sanitation - reduction of disease, not vaccines. Large population centers were where the issues were for the most part. There were some statistics juxtaposing villages with little to no vaccination but good sanitation verses larger population centers with vaccination and poor sanitation.
I think the most shocking chapter of that book was on baby formula. I had no idea there was such widespread use of it in 1940s-1960s. The statistics and information in that chapter about antibodies for diseases being passed on from generation to generation verses no antibodies in formula and the implications of that were something I had never been exposed to. In a small scale way, through the birth and nursing of our 6 kids, I have seen this first hand. One of the older kids will get sick and it'll get passed around to the other kids and myself. But my wife and the new baby that is being nursed, do not get whatever it is that we have. It is amazing.
Our culture, being what it is, usually signals to us the things our family should research more before deciding on a course of action. The signal I see is that if most people are doing something, we should probably check into it. I would imagine that most people on the forum have come to realize this about conventional farming/animal husbandry.
Anyway, it is not a simple black and white issue and I wouldn't say everyone should not vaccinate and nurse their babies. I like the dialog and let each person be convinced in their own mind. Hopefully that is the attitude of both sides of the argument.