'Theoretically this level of creeping Orwellian dynamics should ramp up our awareness, but what happens instead is that each alert becomes less and less effective because we're incredibly stupid.' - Jerry Holkins
D Nikolls wrote:Chat GPT is not a good choice for electrical information. It cannot be relied upon for technical details that might cause a fire or injury.
You need to size your fuse to protect your wiring, and to size your wiring to suit the maximum current.
I personally do not install cheap chinese fuses, fuseholders, breakers, relays, etc.. I have had them melt/burn up far below their rated capacity, after working fine for months on end. I am not sure if I'd prefer a cheapo fuse/breaker to none at all.. but I wouldn't run either option in anything but a crisis.
With lithium of any sort you should consider the maximum interrupting current rating of protection devices; there are plenty of fuses and breakers that are rated high enough in terms of max amps, but they cannot all be relied upon not to short when faced with the massive potential current of a lithium battery.
A good source for info specific to this topic is Will Prowse's DIY solar forum; https://diysolarforum.com.
D Nikolls wrote:Chat GPT is not a good choice for electrical information. It cannot be relied upon for technical details that might cause a fire or injury.
You need to size your fuse to protect your wiring, and to size your wiring to suit the maximum current.
I personally do not install cheap chinese fuses, fuseholders, breakers, relays, etc.. I have had them melt/burn up far below their rated capacity, after working fine for months on end. I am not sure if I'd prefer a cheapo fuse/breaker to none at all.. but I wouldn't run either option in anything but a crisis.
With lithium of any sort you should consider the maximum interrupting current rating of protection devices; there are plenty of fuses and breakers that are rated high enough in terms of max amps, but they cannot all be relied upon not to short when faced with the massive potential current of a lithium battery.
A good source for info specific to this topic is Will Prowse's DIY solar forum; https://diysolarforum.com.
Michael Qulek wrote:Looking at your wire pic, you do NOT measure the thickness of the wire including the insulation. You need to measure the thickness of the copper wire itself. Your pic is a bit blurry, but it looks like the thickness with the insulation is ~7mm. Assuming that the plastic is ~1mm thick, that means you are likely to have a copper wire that's maybe 5mm in diameter. Referring back to the chart on wire gauge above, that looks like it's likely to be either 6 gauge, or 4 gauge (American scale). I'd say thats totally inadequate for supplying your inverter with power. Maybe it's OK to use it just to turn the inverter on, and check for power, but no way would I ever try to apply a full load to that inverter, with that wire. Since the wire appears to be originally attached to the battery, instead of the inverter itself, I'm expecting that the battery selected was originally designed for a smaller application. That goes along the lines of what I mentioned before, that this battery is too small for your application.
Looking at the MPPT section of your AiO, it appears that the operating voltage is between 90VDC and 500VDC. That means my example above with three panels in series might not be appropriate for your electronics. Having only three 30V panels in series might not guarranty that you supply >90VDC at all times. It would be better to use at least four 30V panels to get at least 120VDC.
I'm focusing on the 30V panels mostly because that is the common variety that appears most abundant right now, with many going for only 30-40$ right now. Maybe higher in Ukraine? It appears that your MPPT's optimal voltage is around 240VDC, so you could go with up to 8 of those panels in series to make that voltage. I prefer ground mounts, rather than putting panels on the roof, and the most I've built now is an array frame that can hold 6 residential panels. That would be ~180V (1500W), which would work well for you. If you build rotating mounts like mine, you can rotate it East in morning, and West in the afternoon, resulting in more total power.
I'd consider building the array frame like I've pic below, though with such a small battery, the extra watts won't get you much. You really need a bigger battery to take advantage of extra solar.
Michael Qulek wrote:With a cross-section of 25mm2, it looks like it lays somewhere between 3 gauge, and 4 gauge, following American guidelines. In the real-world, that looks like it is likely to handle 80A without getting too hot. That works out to be about 4000W with a battery feeding the inverter at around 50V. Most likely you are likely to get by as long as you never attempt to run the inverter flat out, at maximum wattage. But, it's your call as how hot you are willing to push your wiring.
I can understand though that you are in a country at war right now, and you really have to make do with what you can find at the moment. What I can suggest you do now is just attempt to run the unit supporting loads like the refrigerator, and lights, but not turn on any big-ticket items like an electric heater, or a microwave. You can put a hand on the insulated part of the wire while running your loads to see just how hot it's actually getting.
You can control that a bit better by fusing it with a lower rating fuse, like 80A, even if you install it in front of a 150A breaker. Some time in the future, when it becomes practical to upgrade your wiring, the 80A fuse can be dispensed with.
Have you started working on your solar input yet? You haven't mentioned one word about panels yet?
. If I understand correctly, it is necessary to arrange 10 panels in 2 rows, which is indicated by fractional numbers in red and yellow?David Baillie wrote:Based on the posted specs of the inverter I would say you go for the strings of 10 Panels. With these lower end all in one inverters they often have a "turn on" voltage for the charge controller higher then the low voltage cut out for the charge controller. So it says it can go down to 90 volts on the solar string but really needs 120-140 volts just to Wake up. If you were to go with 3 strings of 6 you would risk having them not turn on until they are in direct sun with any shading shutting down the string. I would say with your setup a string of 10 would be your best bet. You will have to play with the arrangement in terms of shading but you might end up with the east one producing all day despite the chimney and the west one loosing power in the afternoon due to the roof shading. That is a better option then trying to balance the two strings so they are equally mediocre. Without doing a full workup of your site that is what i would recommend. You will have to watch out for high voltage in the string. On cold days when the sun first hits the panels the voltage they produce spikes and can exceed the high limit of the charge controller. The newer all in one charge controllers usually just overload and refuse it but some of the older ones burned out and died. We usually design max string voltage to 1.25x the VOC of the solar panel x # of panels. That value should be bellow your max voltage of the string. Of course time of year, angle to sun, gauge of wire, length of wire from panels to charge controller all play a role.
I am attaching a modified picture showing how I would do the strings. you will have to figure out the best wire path for each string and I killed three panels to give you 20 total. Based on experience the three closest to the intersecting roofs will have the biggest loss due to shading and snow. In terms of safety replace the inverter wire when you can with a 0 or 00 gauge wire, I put a fusible link in the positive wire near the positive terminal for safety. Usually the breakers rated CE that can be mounted on a din rail even of chinese manufacture I find work well enough. I do not like the black square screwed on ones with the resetable temp overload as they are usually low voltage marine gear and unreliable. The din rail mounted fuse holders you showed are good. Make sure they are rated for the voltage you will be using. I wish you well as winter rolls in.
Cheers, David Baillie
bogdan smith wrote:
. If I understand correctly, it is necessary to arrange 10 panels in 2 rows, which is indicated by fractional numbers in red and yellow?David Baillie wrote:Based on the posted specs of the inverter I would say you go for the strings of 10 Panels. With these lower end all in one inverters they often have a "turn on" voltage for the charge controller higher then the low voltage cut out for the charge controller. So it says it can go down to 90 volts on the solar string but really needs 120-140 volts just to Wake up. If you were to go with 3 strings of 6 you would risk having them not turn on until they are in direct sun with any shading shutting down the string. I would say with your setup a string of 10 would be your best bet. You will have to play with the arrangement in terms of shading but you might end up with the east one producing all day despite the chimney and the west one loosing power in the afternoon due to the roof shading. That is a better option then trying to balance the two strings so they are equally mediocre. Without doing a full workup of your site that is what i would recommend. You will have to watch out for high voltage in the string. On cold days when the sun first hits the panels the voltage they produce spikes and can exceed the high limit of the charge controller. The newer all in one charge controllers usually just overload and refuse it but some of the older ones burned out and died. We usually design max string voltage to 1.25x the VOC of the solar panel x # of panels. That value should be bellow your max voltage of the string. Of course time of year, angle to sun, gauge of wire, length of wire from panels to charge controller all play a role.
I am attaching a modified picture showing how I would do the strings. you will have to figure out the best wire path for each string and I killed three panels to give you 20 total. Based on experience the three closest to the intersecting roofs will have the biggest loss due to shading and snow. In terms of safety replace the inverter wire when you can with a 0 or 00 gauge wire, I put a fusible link in the positive wire near the positive terminal for safety. Usually the breakers rated CE that can be mounted on a din rail even of chinese manufacture I find work well enough. I do not like the black square screwed on ones with the resetable temp overload as they are usually low voltage marine gear and unreliable. The din rail mounted fuse holders you showed are good. Make sure they are rated for the voltage you will be using. I wish you well as winter rolls in.
Cheers, David Baillie
bogdan smith wrote:10 solar panels
https://static.longi.com/Hi_MO_6_Explorer_LR_5_54_HTH_415_430_M_V03_DG_cd1618eade.pdf
NO that is not quite correct. The new high voltage solar charge controller built into your unit do not have a "ground" really. They have a negative input and a positive input which go into the pos and neg ports of the unit. On older lower voltage arrays the "negative" feed and the system negative were the same, not on these ones. The only ground is from the solar array metal components to your house ground wire. Some places refer to this as "Earthing" or " bonding" if that helps. The only grounding you do to the inverters and feed from the solar array is connect the grounding terminal of the inverter to your home grounding wire preferably the large main one leading into the house.bogdan smith wrote:Thank you, do I understand correctly that I can connect the ground wire from the panels to the general ground for the house, but for some reason they recommend making a separate ground for the panels or not making a ground for such a small station
That is old thinking based on the lower voltage charge controllers. You simply cannot connect the negative side of a high voltage array to ground they will not work. You do run the risk of conducting a lightning strike down to the ground cable with a metal assembly on the roof. The alternative is a lightning strike happens, it does not have a clear path to ground and it finds the best one it can; usually through the positive AND negative solar feed and shorts out everything it comes in contact with. I would suggest you install a whole home surge protector if you install a roof mounted array if lightning is an issue but really all homes should have them.bogdan smith wrote:Some say that solar panels are located on the roof of the house (in most cases this is the highest point of the household, therefore it attracts a potential discharge). Connecting this most dangerous (potentially) point to the common grounding - connecting all consumers of the household to objects of increased danger. Others say that one grounding circuit is needed so that there is no potential difference
He got surgery to replace his foot with a pig. He said it was because of this tiny ad:
Freaky Cheap Heat - 2 hour movie - HD streaming
https://permies.com/wiki/238453/Freaky-Cheap-Heat-hour-movie
|