Hi John,
Thank you for clarifying your method.
I see now that there was a slight misunderstanding caused by the language barrier and our different approaches to process description.
When I mentioned the physical and chemical limits of the pores, I did not mean a static model in the sense of a dead environment.
After all, my entire 9-year experience with Terra Preta is based on micro-organisms and nutrients. However, as a production technician, I always look at it through the lens of process stability and efficiency.
By the way, have you noticed the scientific descriptions of how plants literally "eat" microorganisms contained in the soil?
I have a dedicated folder with microphotographs of this phenomenon somewhere deep in my archives, though I cannot find it at the moment.
It is truly a fascinating topic.
For instance, this short video beautifully illustrates the rhizophagy cycle, where root tips absorb bacteria to strip them of nitrogen and minerals:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=akUi3ZmN2J8
Regarding the ingredients: the word "manure" is universally understood, but adding "flour" without specifying the exact quantity can be very misleading for beginners, which is why I cautioned against it.
Furthermore, I must gently disagree with your view on compost tea—a properly made compost tea is never just a carrier of microbes; it naturally contains a significant amount of soluble nutrients, humic substances, and minerals extracted from the compost matrix itself.
At the end of the day, we both want the same thing—a thriving, diverse soil food web. We just describe the engineering of it from slightly different cultural and technical perspectives.