posted 6 years ago
There is a magic number, like 30 or 40 percent voc over absorb voltage..... ive never honored it even though it is good design. Most of our runs to a charge controller fall between 80v and 160v anyhow and charge 48v batteries.
I use the function purely to get power home at higher electrical pressure in a fight against resistance and high current in pv source circuits for building practical size wire and conduit arrangements in the home run and pv overcurrent protection, etc.
You will likely not get the proportions you are looking for. It is just a result of the electronic design. Rarely if ever, would you need as much array current as you do charge current and they are related through power, power should be reflected when you do the math backwards. A pwm or other control will do this but we are talking step down controls and having 100a pv feeding a 100a control at higher than battery voltage would melt stuff.
Nother edit) your coldest temps recorded with a safety margin is required to approach max volts. This is a critical design parameter for these devices. The do not exceed voltage has to be known and the temp co-efficient in order to know how many (modules) in the series strings.
It is amazing to use -55 degF and see what would have popped a controller once in 20 or 30 years. When they are yours and even better yours and inexpensive, you can get courageous.
I just got back from wiring 2 flexmax 100-300 controls...... at 1000$ apiece, im not letting it be in my portfolio or have to bear the cost. Those controls cost as much as half my entire off grid system and i cannot afford the gold i spin for a living, especially not as a paper weight or door stop.
An FM 100 would make a great small boat anchor!