• Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
permaculture forums growies critters building homesteading energy monies kitchen purity ungarbage community wilderness fiber arts art permaculture artisans regional education skip experiences global resources cider press projects digital market permies.com pie forums private forums all forums
this forum made possible by our volunteer staff, including ...
master stewards:
  • Carla Burke
  • John F Dean
  • r ransom
  • Nancy Reading
  • Timothy Norton
  • Jay Angler
stewards:
  • paul wheaton
  • Pearl Sutton
  • Eric Hanson
master gardeners:
  • Christopher Weeks
  • M Ljin
gardeners:
  • thomas rubino
  • Megan Palmer
  • Benjamin Dinkel

Women homesteading ALONE?

 
Posts: 1043
Location: In the woods, West Coast USA
217
  • Likes 7
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator


This probably won't be a popular response, but I think it is something to take into consideration.  

Despite the popularity of posting one's life on social media sites, I think it's important for privacy and safety to stay as anonymous as possible if you are a solo homesteader or a couple.  It's not just your best online buds who are keeping track of you.  Everyone in the world with a computer and a connection can keep track of you, and they are not all nice people.  

Long ago we learned that some individuals are jealous of others who own acreage, even if they have a valuable house that is not on acreage.  This was a surprise, because if someone wants acreage you'd think they'd get it, but they don't.  They just somehow feel threatened and resentful, and spread discord either locally or online.

Some individuals resent others' success.  While we may be thinking we are showing that rural homesteading alone or with others is possible and satisfying, not everyone looks at it that way.  

They are not just questionable individuals. They are governments of all kinds in all countries, employers, insurance companies, banks with potential for getting a loan, medical companies, lawyer in divorce cases and child custody battles, etc.  They will not give you the benefit of the doubt when it comes to what they will charge you if you do business with them.   They can affect your tax bracket and your property value.  If they did give you the benefit of the doubt they'd charge you less, and that never happens.

As an example, a car insurance company sees that you driving along what they consider to be dangerous and possibly icy mountain roads will charge you more than if you drove in the city.  Medical insurance companies will use the statistic that most injuries happen on a farm.  Developing the property without proper permits will get a violation attached to the property, making it hard to develop or sell, which you may not know about unless you look it up in the county database.

And obviously you don't want a stalker.

Living off grid or rurally is hard enough without all of these added modern complications.

:-)









 
Posts: 6
1
  • Likes 3
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
The decision for a woman to homestead alone is an exercise in ultimate self-reliance, yet it requires a cold-eyed assessment of vulnerability. While the lifestyle offers unparalleled autonomy, the reality of rural isolation introduces unique security risks that must be managed with tactical foresight. Success on a solo homestead depends on the ability to transform a lonely property into a fortified sanctuary.
Physical security begins with deterrence and "hardening" the site. Unlike urban environments where help is a block away, a rural homestead relies on distance and delay. Implementing "onion-skin" security—layers of protection that start at the property line—is essential. This includes locked perimeter gates, motion-activated floodlights, and gravel paths that serve as a natural auditory alarm. Many solo women also find that Livestock Guardian Dogs (LGDs) are the most effective security investment; they provide a 24/7 presence that deters both four-legged predators and human intruders through sheer physical presence and vocal warnings.
Technological tools further bridge the gap created by isolation. Cellular-based security cameras and driveway sensors act as digital eyes, providing real-time alerts even in areas without Wi-Fi. However, the most effective security "system" is often social. Establishing a mutual-aid pact with nearby neighbors ensures that someone is alerted if a routine check-in is missed. This community connection creates a "virtual household," providing the safety of a group without compromising the homesteader’s daily privacy. Homesteading alone is not about living in fear, but about mastering one's environment. By combining modern surveillance, traditional guardian animals, and community networks, a woman can mitigate the risks of isolation. In doing so, she secures not just her property, but the mental peace required to enjoy the independence she worked so hard to build.
 
I agree. Here's the link: http://stoves2.com
reply
    Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic