posted 5 years ago
To get the carcass size you are looking for, you will have to go with woolies, but it is not a bad thing. Shearing will cost a little bit of money, but the bigger carcass size MORE than makes up for it. It goes beyond just the extra weight they will put on, it means you get a longer loin, and that is what EVERYONE wants with lamb...lamb chops!
If your farm can carry a few lambs, lets say (3), you will be getting at least 75 more pounds of hang weight just by going with a woolie breed. Suddenly the $6 per sheep, and $30 farm call for sheep shearing, makes shearing very inexpensive. It is like paying 50 cents a pound for LAMB! LAMB....which is $14 a pound in the stores.
($6 X 3=$18 + $30=$48)
(75 extra pounds of lamb=$500) Because you have to remember, a woolie sheep has a much longer loin, so you would have to BUY $7/pound lamb chops for what you are getting from your own pasture raised sheep.
If you still are not convinced, remember all sheep need their hooves trimmed, dewormers given, and vacinations. On my woolies, I do that on shearing day because they are on their backs anyway. i always wonder what sheep farmers with hair sheep think when they are doing that, AND losing money?
If you still, still are not convinced, you might when that 9 year old irl still thinks your sheep is a goat because sheep are just supposed to have wool. All the explanations in the world will not convince a child that sheep do not always have wool.
I can see if people live in the south where it is hot; then yes, hair sheep do make sense, but when it comes to comparing hair sheep and woolies, carcass size more than makes up for $48 in shearing costs. It is easy math: it requires (2) hair sheep to equate to (1) woolie sheep. Can you raise (3) hair sheep per year for $48? I can put it another way, if I handed you $500, and then told you to hand me $48 back, wouldn't you take the deal? That is the way it is with woolies. You pay $48 for shearing, and get $500 more in meat.