Hi Thomas. I had experimented with this "J tube" in the picture. What you might have not noticed, is the
feed tube and burn tunnel of this one, goes into the gas canister tangentially. (to make myself real clear, perpendicular to the radius) And the burn tunnel was cut straight at the centerpoint, (or radius intersection) not conforming to the gas canister's curve. What bill Pentz calls a "neutral vane" on his site. IIRC. This was an attempt at a cyclonic rocket. What i remember, when dismantling it, was the dimple in the fly ash, in the center.
I don't know if it worked "well" being untested with a combustion analyser. But it made the top of the canister, where the "heat riser was attached sag under it's own weight.
The idea behind this was, having an expansion chamber between burn tunnel, and heat riser, where the burning gases would have plenty of room to expand, and time to burn. And also the flame would crash, more or less onto itself.
But you sure could use a cyclone to clean fly ash. If i had to do it, i would do as i did before, the burn tunnel, as short as possible, entering the cyclone, so the flames are still burning in the cyclone. That would gibe turbulence, time,and by insulating the cyclone, temperature.
And i would use a short double cone cyclone.
Like this, entering at the widest. Bellow the top cone. But i admit, this is just from gut feeling. To reduce the expansion chamber's size a bit. Not using a full cyclone, as per Bill Pentz's plans.